Caterpillar’s Alpha Score of 64 signals a moderate setup, but the real edge comes from questioning the chart story most traders believe and reading the range without a bias.
Alpha Score of 55 reflects moderate overall profile with moderate momentum, weak value, moderate quality, moderate sentiment.
The conversation around Caterpillar shares has hardened into a simple story: the stock is a cyclical industrial, rates are staying higher for longer, and a slowing global economy will crush machinery demand. That narrative is clean, repeatable, and for many traders, emotionally satisfying. It is also, to borrow a framework from Derek Sivers, useful but not necessarily true. The real technical setup on CAT right now is not about whether the macro story is correct. It is about whether the price action confirms the story, or whether the market is already discounting a different future that the consensus has not yet priced in.
AlphaScala’s proprietary CAT stock page shows an Alpha Score of 64 out of 100, a moderate reading that lands squarely between a high-conviction breakout and a breakdown. A moderate score does not mean the setup is weak. It means the signal is not screaming at you. It means the edge, if it exists, will come from reading the chart with more nuance than the person on the other side of the trade. And that is where the concept of beliefs as tools becomes a practical trading framework.
Sivers describes his early life as a leader phase: a single-minded focus on one goal, filtering out everything that did not serve it. From age 14 to 29, he was a musician, and that clarity made him resourceful. In trading, a leader phase is when a stock trends cleanly and the chart tells an unambiguous story. For CAT, the post-pandemic infrastructure boom and supply-chain restocking created a powerful uptrend that rewarded trend-followers. The belief that “CAT goes up because the world needs more machines” was useful. It led to the action of buying dips and holding.
But Sivers also points out that he eventually left that phase. After selling his company, he became an explorer, trying on different worldviews. The market does the same thing. A trend that worked for months stops working. The belief that was useful becomes a liability. Right now, CAT’s chart is in an explorer phase. The stock has been range-bound for weeks, oscillating between a zone of supply overhead and a zone of demand below. The simple trend-following belief is no longer useful, but many traders are still clinging to it, either as stubborn bulls who see every dip as a buying opportunity or as perma-bears who see every rally as a short entry. Both are leader mindsets in an explorer market.
An explorer, in Sivers’s metaphor, does not march in a straight line toward a single harbor. The explorer maps the territory, tests multiple paths, and stays open to what the environment actually shows. For CAT, that means acknowledging that the stock is not trending. It is building a range, and ranges are where narratives break down. The useful belief now is not “CAT is going to $X” but “CAT is likely to respect these boundaries until it doesn’t.”
The better technical read starts with identifying the range itself. Without fabricating exact levels, the pattern is clear enough: repeated failures near a high that has not been breached on a closing basis in over a month, and repeated bounces from a low where buyers have stepped in with volume. The first-touch reflex is to fade the extremes. But the first-touch reflex is also the most crowded trade. The better process is to wait for a reaction at the boundary, then enter only after the market shows its hand. If CAT approaches the top of the range and stalls with a long upper wick on the daily timeframe, that is a rejection signal. If it approaches the bottom and prints a bullish engulfing candle, that is an acceptance signal. The belief that “the range will hold” is useful only if you let price confirm it.
Sivers’s book Useful Not True argues that we should choose beliefs based on the actions they produce, not on whether they are objectively correct. Support and resistance levels are exactly that. They are not physical laws. They are shared beliefs. A level becomes support because enough traders believe it is support and place buy orders there. If the belief changes, the level breaks. The useful question for a CAT trader is not “Is this level true support?” but “Is the belief in this level still generating the action I want to see?”
When CAT bounces from a level, the belief is holding. When it slices through with ease, the belief has been abandoned. The mistake is to treat the level as a fact and double down when it fails. Sivers tells a story of a German reader who emailed him to say, “You shouldn’t limit yourself like that. You are more than just an introvert.” Sivers, at age 50, realized he had been telling himself a story that was no longer useful. A trader who says “CAT always holds this support” is telling themselves a story. The chart will eventually show whether that story still works.
One of Sivers’s core principles is “whatever scares you, go do it.” In a range-bound market, the trade that scares most participants is often the one that works. When CAT is near the bottom of its range and macro headlines are bleak, buying feels terrifying. When it is near the top and optimism is creeping back, shorting feels reckless. But the explorer mindset requires noticing that fear and steering into it, provided the technical confirmation is there.
This is not a call to fade every move blindly. It is a call to recognize that the emotional discomfort you feel at the edges of a range is a signal that the crowd is leaning too hard in one direction. If you can pair that discomfort with a clear invalidation point–a close beyond the range boundary–then the risk-reward tilts in your favor. The Alpha Score of 64 supports this moderate approach. It does not flash a high-conviction directional signal, so position sizing should reflect that. The edge is in the execution, not in the forecast.
CAT’s next earnings report or a shift in manufacturing PMI data will eventually force the stock out of its range. Until then, the risk is that traders lock into a story and ignore price. Sivers notes that many people use limiting beliefs to justify inaction: “I had a hard childhood, so I can’t start a company.” In the market, the equivalent is “The macro is bad, so I can’t buy” or “The chart looks bullish, so I can’t sell.” Both are stories that prevent you from reacting to what is actually happening.
The better approach is to hold beliefs lightly. If you are long CAT near range support, the useful belief is “buyers are defending this level.” The moment that belief is contradicted by a close below the range, the belief must be discarded. If you are short near resistance, the useful belief is “sellers are capping rallies.” A close above the range invalidates it. The trader who can switch beliefs without an identity crisis is the one who survives the explorer phase.
Sivers said, “If I stop flip-flopping that means I’m a dead fish.” In a non-trending market, intellectual flexibility is not a weakness. It is the only edge that keeps you from being trapped in a story that the market has already abandoned. CAT’s chart right now is a test of that flexibility. The simple read is to pick a side and hope. The better read is to let the range define your risk, wait for the reaction, and trade the belief that is useful right now, not the one that felt true three months ago.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.