
Sebi's pilot tests tokenised bonds for real-time settlement and fractional ownership. Broader adoption depends on the pilot delivering secondary market depth and a legal framework.
India’s capital markets regulator is launching a pilot to tokenise corporate bonds, a move that could reshape fixed-income access for retail and institutional investors. Tuhin Kanta Pandey, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) , announced the plan on Tuesday at the Care Edge Debt Market Summit 2026 in Mumbai. The pilot tests whether blockchain-based digital tokens can deliver faster settlement, better traceability, and automated servicing–and whether that translates into deeper liquidity.
The simple read is that tokenisation automatically improves bond market efficiency. The better market read requires weighing infrastructure risk, regulatory gaps, and early-stage liquidity constraints that could trap unwary participants.
Pandey framed the pilot as a test, not a rollout. “The pilot will test whether tokenisation can deliver faster settlement, better traceability, automated servicing and greater transparency,” he said. “Once you do that, there will be a greater possibility of more liquidity.”
Sebi is starting with corporate bonds, a well-understood instrument with an existing regulatory framework. Prateek Gupta, Head of Business at Mudrex, said the choice reduces complexity for the initial test. “If the pilot demonstrates efficiency gains without compromising investor protection, the case for broader adoption, including government securities and other fixed-income products, becomes very straightforward to make.”
The pilot is a controlled experiment. No tokenised bonds are live yet, and Sebi has not set a timeline for completion.
Tokenisation converts a traditional bond into digital tokens on a blockchain. Each token represents a fractional ownership stake. The holder receives the same coupon and principal repayment as a full bondholder, at a much smaller ticket size.
Corporate bonds currently settle on a T+2 cycle – two business days after the trade. On a blockchain, settlement can happen in real time. Gupta explained that real-time settlement frees up capital faster and reduces the counterparty risk that exists between trade and settlement. For collateral management and intraday credit lines, that is a material improvement.
Nikhil Aggarwal, Founder and Group CEO at Grip Invest, described the accessibility shift. “Corporate bonds have historically been an institutional product. Tokenisation allows fractional ownership, meaning an investor does not need to commit large sums to gain exposure to fixed income. That opens a market that has largely been out of reach for everyday investors.”
Every transaction on a distributed ledger is recorded and immutable. Investors get complete visibility into ownership history, coupon payments, and redemption without relying on intermediaries to maintain accurate records. That reduces operational risk and audit costs.
These three structural benefits – faster settlement, lower entry barriers, and transparent records – are the foundation of the tokenisation thesis.
The biggest risks are not the blockchain technology itself. The risks come from the infrastructure built on top of it, according to Aggarwal.
Sebi has flagged concerns that future quantum computers could break the cryptographic algorithms securing the blockchain. Aggarwal noted that this is not an immediate risk. A durable infrastructure must address it before the pilot scales.
India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework defining ownership rights, dispute resolution, and investor protection for tokenised bonds. Gupta said, “Until that framework is complete, institutional participation will remain subdued.” Institutions – insurance companies, pension funds, mutual funds – are the natural liquidity providers. Without them, the tokenised market becomes a retail-only space with limited depth.
Secondary market depth will be limited in the pilot. “Investors need to understand that getting in is easier than getting out,” Gupta said. A tokenised bond that trades once a week is not more liquid than a traditional bond trading once a week. The pilot will only prove liquidity improvement if it generates sustained two-way flow.
Two concrete markers would show the pilot is working.
First, demonstrated real-time settlement with no technical failures across a meaningful number of trades. Second, a visible secondary market with at least 10–20 trades per day in a tokenised bond. That would indicate that buyers and sellers are willing to transact at narrow spreads.
If Sebi then issues a formal regulatory framework defining ownership rights and dispute mechanisms, institutional participants would have the legal certainty to enter. That would trigger a first wave of liquidity.
The pilot could stall in several ways. A cryptographic vulnerability exposed during testing would damage confidence in the entire system. Regulatory delays could prevent issuance beyond the initial test. Primary issuers may not see enough demand to justify tokenisation costs. In any of those scenarios, the pilot remains a pilot and liquidity never materialises.
Gupta noted that the pilot is the right approach for exactly this reason. “None of these risks makes tokenisation a bad idea. They make the pilot, a right approach.”
Sebi has not set a public timeline for the pilot’s conclusion or for any expansion to government securities or longer-dated corporate bonds. The most pragmatic stance for traders and allocators is to monitor the pilot’s volume metrics and regulatory milestones.
The next 12 months will decide whether tokenised bonds become a new asset class or a footnote. If the pilot succeeds, it creates a template for other emerging markets. If it stalls, it confirms that tokenisation requires more than a blockchain to solve liquidity problems.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.