
The RBI wants banks walled off from crypto and stablecoins while pushing tokenized deposits and its e-rupee. The push carries weight beyond India's borders.
The Reserve Bank of India wants a "calibrated containment strategy leaning towards prohibition" for crypto exposure in the banking system, while carving out space for tokenized deposits and its own digital rupee.
In a recent recommendation to a parliamentary panel, RBI officials urged lawmakers to keep banks and regulated financial institutions completely insulated from crypto assets and privately issued stablecoins. The central bank's preferred framework would prevent any bank exposure through payments, settlements, or balance sheets.
The Supreme Court struck down the RBI's 2018 circular that barred banks from servicing crypto firms back in March 2020. There has been no legislative ban since. The RBI is playing a differentiation game. Private crypto and stablecoins sit on one side of the line, deemed too risky for the formal banking system. On the other side: tokenized deposits issued by banks and the government's own Central Bank Digital Currency, the e-rupee, which the RBI views as the acceptable face of digital finance.
Deputy Governor T Rabi Sankar argued in December 2025 that stablecoins don't offer unique advantages compared to fiat currencies or CBDCs, and could pose "substantial risks to monetary stability and systemic resilience." India is currently running pilots for both wholesale and retail versions of the e-rupee alongside commercial banks experimenting with tokenized deposits.
Even after the Supreme Court overturned the 2018 banking ban, many Indian banks remained reluctant to service crypto exchanges and platforms. As of mid-2026, many FIU-registered Virtual Digital Asset service providers still maintain banking relationships despite the RBI's stance.
India already imposes a 30% tax on crypto gains with no offset for losses, plus a 1% tax deducted at source on transactions.
Without banking rails, exchanges and DeFi platforms face constant friction in on-ramps and off-ramps. The preference for CBDCs and tokenized deposits over private stablecoins also carries implications beyond India's borders. If one of the world's largest economies refuses to integrate private stablecoins into its financial system, it strengthens the hand of other central banks arguing for similar restrictions.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.