
India's food regulator issued notices to liquor makers over added flavours and age claims. The industry says it's a regulatory interpretation dispute, not a safety issue. A Bombay High Court challenge is pending.
India's food safety regulator has sent notices to alcoholic beverage manufacturers over added flavours and age declarations, opening a new regulatory front for an industry worth $148.3 billion. The dispute centers on whether nature-identical flavours violate rules that require spirits like rum, brandy, gin, whisky, wine and beer to have only their natural taste and aroma. The regulator also flagged age claims on labels, saying some products declare an age that does not correspond to the youngest spirit in the blend.
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) posted the findings on Instagram on Thursday, directing companies to comply and explain why action should not be taken under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The regulator did not name the companies that received the show-cause notices.
The industry pushed back immediately. The Confederation of Indian Alcoholic Beverage Companies (CIABC) said FSSAI has called consultations with stakeholders next week. Sanjit Padhi, chief executive of the International Spirits and Wines Association of India (ISWAI), said members are in compliance and will seek clarity. An industry executive, speaking on condition of anonymity, said nature-identical flavours are a legitimate part of producing affordable spirits in India, where prolonged barrel ageing is commercially unviable due to high inventory costs, imported barrel costs and evaporation losses. The executive added that the Indian-made foreign liquor (IMFL) category was created under colonial-era excise laws to suit Indian climate and affordability, making it distinct from European spirits.
The executive said the notices have been issued to a broad set of domestic and multinational liquor companies manufacturing in India, and that the regulator's directions have been challenged before the Bombay High Court. Poonam Chandel, former managing director of Neuworld Spirits, said FSSAI has not publicly disclosed the names of the companies. She noted that the use of colours, both natural and synthetic, is widespread across whisky, brandy, rum, RTDs and flavoured vodka, and that age claims are difficult to verify through laboratory testing.
The market is large and growing. India's alcoholic beverages market was valued at $148.3 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach $176.2 billion by 2034, according to a government report citing IMARC Group. Distilled spirits account for a large share of consumption by value. The industry maintains the dispute is about regulatory interpretation, not product safety. Every batch is tested by government laboratories before reaching consumers, the executive said.
The next concrete marker is the FSSAI consultation with stakeholders next week. The Bombay High Court challenge adds a legal timeline. If the regulator wins, manufacturers may need to reformulate products or change labels, raising costs and potentially disrupting supply chains. If the industry wins, the current practices remain, and the regulatory risk recedes. The court case will be the key event to watch.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.