
Seventeen years after Bitcoin promised to eliminate banks, crypto firms look more like the incumbents. Chris Skinner says the distinction is gone.
Back in 2008, Bitcoin's genesis block carried a message about bank bailouts. The whole project was supposed to kill intermediaries – peer-to-peer electronic cash that no central party could freeze, inflate, or gatekeep. Seventeen years later, the industry's largest institutions look more like the incumbents they set out to replace than any threat to them.
Chris Skinner, the independent analyst and author of Digital Bank, put it bluntly in a blog post this week: "Crypto wanted to get rid of banks. Now they are banks." His point is not that crypto is a failure. The industry absorbed a lesson the original cypherpunks missed – decentralised networks need trusted gateways to reach real capital, real retail users, and real regulators. Without those gateways, coins sit in wallets and circulate inside a closed loop. Price discovery, liquidity, and client onboarding all pass through centralised intermediaries today.
Galaxy Digital is a case in point. The firm trades digital assets, manages a venture portfolio, advises on capital raises, and recently won a mandate from Bank Leumi – an Israeli bank founded in 1902 – to trade Bitcoin, Ether, and Solana on its behalf. The Bank Leumi Taps Galaxy for Bitcoin, Ether and Solana Trading story crystallised what had been clear for a while: crypto firms are now the infrastructure providers for the very system they were supposed to replace.
Skinner also pointed to a chart from LinkedIn that mapped the current financial-technology stack. The graphic ran from core banking systems and ledger providers at the bottom, through payments rails and card networks in the middle, to consumer-facing apps at the top. Crypto companies appeared in multiple layers: stablecoin issuers sat near settlement infrastructure, exchanges appeared as distribution channels, and tokenisation platforms linked to custody banks. The chart was not exhaustive. It showed something that has become hard to deny: the architecture of money no longer separates "banks" and "crypto" into two columns. They share the same layers.
Tokenised assets drove that message home in July. The volume of tokenised products hit $1.48 billion, with the Nasdaq-100 tracker QQQ token alone accounting for 288% of the monthly volume – a number that reflects not demand it reflects the velocity of automated market-making and arbitrage between on-chain versions and the underlying ETF. Bybit listed tokenised Tesla and Meta shares through a partnership with xStocks, and Bybit Adds Meta, Tesla xStocks as Tokenized Equities Hit $1.48B showed that retail traders on crypto exchanges now trade synthetic Apple and Nvidia alongside perpetual swaps. The tokenisation boom is essentially a securities business running on blockchain settlement, operated by exchanges that used to call themselves unregulated.
Regulation has accelerated the convergence, not slowed it. Mastercard this month tested a single-audit tool for stablecoin compliance through a partnership with Borderless.xyz. The project aimed to let a single compliance check satisfy multiple jurisdictions – essentially repackaging the correspondent-banking model for stablecoin issuers. Anthony Scaramucci, founder of SkyBridge Capital, told AlphaScala in July that crypto adoption would eventually become invisible to the end user, absorbed into the same apps and accounts people already use. "You won't know if a transaction settles on a blockchain or a legacy ledger," he said. "You will just know it happened." Scaramucci's point aligns with Skinner's: the technology is merging into the financial system, not replacing it. The industry is no longer asking whether banks will adopt crypto. They have already farmed it out to the crypto firms that are now effectively their broker-dealers.
Robinhood is betting on the on-chain version of the Nasdaq-100 as its next big draw. The brokerage's tokenised QQQ tracker drove a large share of its July volume, and the company has been building out a dedicated chain – the Robinhood Chain – to house tokenised equities and derivatives. The bet is that retail traders who already use Robinhood for stocks will want to trade the same index in a tokenised wrapper, with 24/7 settlement and no waiting for T+1. Tokenized QQQ drove 288% of July volume; Robinhood Chain bets on it highlighted how blurred the line has become: a stock brokerage issuing a token that tracks a stock index, settled on a blockchain, traded alongside crypto.
None of this means crypto has failed. It means the industry made peace with the reality that money moves through trusted intermediaries. The question Skinner raised this week – whether the industry is still "fintech" or has just become banking with a different database – is the right one. The chart he cited suggests the answer is already obvious. The layer diagram has no gap labelled "crypto" and no gap labelled "banking." Both terms describe the same infrastructure, seen from different starting points.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.