BloFin vs Bybit copy trading: Which platform wins in 2026

Anyone deciding between BloFin and Bybit for copy trading wants the same thing: which one lets me mirror a trader more precisely, vet that trader's record more thoroughly, and keep more of the profit. Most comparison pages that rank for this question answer with a generic score or a feature checklist that leaves the copy-trading row blank. This one settles it with the specifics that actually matter, taken from each exchange's official help center and verified in June 2026.

The short answer up front. The two platforms now tie on the entry point: both require 100 USDT to start copying a trader. That's where the similarity ends.

Bybit wins on order-type flexibility. Its copy trader can mirror futures, spot, and options orders. BloFin restricts copy trading to perpetual futures. For anyone running a strategy that hedges spot positions with leveraged futures, or who trades options for gamma exposure, Bybit's wider scope matters.

BloFin wins on maximum copy positions. Bybit caps simultaneous copy-trading positions at 10. BloFin allows 50. A trader running a multi-leg strategy or a grid of small entries will hit the Bybit limit fast. BloFin's higher ceiling means the user can match the lead trader's portfolio density more closely.

Position sizing methods differ meaningfully. Bybit offers four modes: fixed margin, fixed quantity, ratio by equity, and mirror by leverage. BloFin offers three: fixed quantity, ratio by margin, and ratio by equity. Neither exchange supports position-level stop-loss orders on the copy. Both handle stop-loss only at the exchange account level, not per trade. That omission matters for anyone wanting to cap single-trade risk without exiting the whole copy relationship.