
Lummis and Gallego's resolution urges Trump not to pardon Sam Bankman-Fried, adding political heat to the CLARITY Act's ethics provisions at a critical juncture.
Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ruben Gallego introduced a bipartisan resolution Wednesday urging President Trump not to pardon Sam Bankman-Fried. The move came days after a federal appeals court upheld his 25-year sentence.
The four-page resolution states that under no circumstances should Bankman-Fried receive executive clemency. Both senators are central figures in negotiating the CLARITY Act, the crypto market structure legislation currently advancing through Congress. That context gives the resolution weight beyond a symbolic statement.
Lummis said Bankman-Fried had his day in court, a jury didn't buy the act, and a judge gave him 25 years for a reason. Gallego went further, calling him a con artist who stole millions of Americans' savings and showed no remorse, instead trying to claim he was a victim of lawfare.
On June 12, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the fraud conviction and sentence. The three-judge panel wrote that overwhelming evidence proved Bankman-Fried knowingly committed large-scale fraud while publicly assuring customers their funds were safe. Those funds were simultaneously used for real estate purchases, political donations, and investments.
Bankman-Fried has spent the past year posting on X praising Trump's actions, including the pardon of former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández. Trump previously said he has no plans to pardon him. The White House did not respond Wednesday.
The resolution lands at a critical moment for crypto legislation. Gallego has pushed to include provisions in the CLARITY Act barring the president, vice president, and senior officials from engaging in digital asset transactions. That ethics provision remains a major sticking point. Linking SBF to the broader pardon debate adds political pressure on the White House at a delicate point in the bill's progress.
The simple read is a bipartisan shot across the bow: don't pardon a convicted fraudster. The better market read is sharper. The CLARITY Act's ethics clause is the holdup, and Gallego is using every lever to push it through. Drawing a direct line from SBF to the pardon power gives the provision moral weight it otherwise lacks. The question now is whether Trump responds, ignores the resolution, or signals a position on the ethics language. Any of those could shift the bill's trajectory and, by extension, the regulatory framework for US crypto markets.
Watch the White House response, or lack of one, in the next few sessions. If the administration offers no comment, the bill's chances of clearing before the August recess slip. If Trump publicly rejects the pardon idea, the ethics clause becomes a smaller hurdle.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.