
Bank of England's Megan Greene says tokenized deposits may overtake stablecoins within five years. Banks see a path to blockchain settlement without losing deposit base.
Stablecoins have become central to crypto trading and dollar liquidity. Banks are now preparing a response. The tool is the tokenized deposit, a digital version of commercial bank money that moves on blockchain rails while staying inside regulated banking.
A stablecoin is issued by a non-bank and backed by reserves. A tokenized deposit is a claim on a commercial bank deposit. The difference matters. Policymakers worry about stablecoins pulling money from banks and creating financial-stability risks.
Bank of England policymaker Megan Greene recently said she expects stablecoin demand to fade within five years, overtaken by tokenized deposits. Her view reflects a growing belief among central bankers that commercial banks, not standalone issuers, are better placed to provide digital money for mainstream finance.
Greene’s argument is not that stablecoins will disappear. They already play a major role in crypto trading and cross-border transfers. Tokenized deposits could become the preferred option for regulated institutions that want blockchain settlement without moving money outside the banking system.
For banks, the appeal is direct. Tokenized deposits allow them to modernize payments while defending their deposit base. Clients want programmable money and faster settlement. Banks can offer those features without giving up the core economics of banking.
For regulators, tokenized deposits may look safer than privately issued stablecoins. They sit inside bank supervision and capital rules. They may integrate more easily with central bank payment systems and wholesale settlement infrastructure.
The United Kingdom is becoming a test case. The Bank of England recently softened parts of its stablecoin framework. It dropped proposed individual holding limits and replaced them with a temporary £40 billion issuance guardrail per systemic stablecoin. Issuers can hold up to 70% of reserves in short-term UK government debt, with the remainder in non-interest-bearing deposits at the central bank.
The Financial Conduct Authority lowered planned capital requirements for non-systemic stablecoin issuers from 2% to 1% of the value issued. The final UK crypto regime is expected to bring trading platforms, custodians, stablecoin issuers, and other crypto firms into full FCA authorisation from October 2027.
These moves show the UK trying to become more competitive without abandoning caution. The Bank of England is focused on protecting credit provision and limiting systemic risk. The FCA is trying to make rules workable for industry. Between those priorities sits the question of which form of digital money will dominate.
The U.S. debate looks different. American policymakers have been more willing to treat dollar stablecoins as a strategic tool that reinforces the global role of the dollar. That creates a contrast with the UK and parts of Europe, where officials emphasize financial stability and bank intermediation.
In crypto markets and cross-border payments, stablecoins may continue to grow quickly because they are already liquid and widely used. In regulated banking and institutional settlement, tokenized deposits may gain ground because they fit more naturally into the existing system. The two models may also coexist. Stablecoins could serve exchanges, wallets, fintechs, and global retail payments. Tokenized deposits could serve banks, corporates, and institutional settlement.
The competition will not be decided by technology alone. Regulation, trust, liquidity, interoperability, and incentives will matter. Stablecoins have market adoption. Tokenized deposits have institutional familiarity and regulatory comfort.
Banks cannot ignore stablecoins. They do not need to copy them exactly. Tokenized deposits give them a way to compete on blockchain rails while keeping money inside the banking system. Greene expects tokenized deposits to overtake stablecoins within five years.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.