
A San Francisco Fed paper finds the trend jobless rate fell from 7.8% in 1976 to 4.8% in 2024, driven by an older, more educated workforce and new cohorts with lower unemployment risk.
The U.S. unemployment rate has been sliding for decades, and the latest research from the San Francisco Fed pins the reason on a slow but powerful shift: the workforce is older, better educated, and newer generations simply have a lower risk of being out of work.
The trend unemployment rate – the level expected once the economy's booms and busts are stripped out – fell from 7.8% in 1976 to 4.8% in 2024, according to a paper by economists Andreas Hornstein and Marianna Kudlyak. That decline is not a fluke of the business cycle. It reflects deep structural changes in who shows up to work and what skills they bring.
Roughly half of that 3-percentage-point drop comes from a change in the composition of the labor force. The share of people over 55 jumped about 10 percentage points between the 1976–1984 period and 2016–2024, the paper shows. Over the same stretch, the share of prime-age workers with more than a high school education surged 26 percentage points. Older and more educated workers have lower unemployment rates. As they become a bigger slice of the workforce, the aggregate number falls even if nothing else changes for any individual group.
The single largest compositional force is education. Rising attainment pushed the trend rate down by roughly 1.1 percentage points. Population aging added another 0.7 percentage point. Shifts in labor force participation trends within groups contributed about 0.3 percentage point.
The other half of the decline comes from lower unemployment within demographic groups. A worker of a given age, gender, and education level is less likely to be unemployed today than a worker with the same profile decades ago. The paper traces this to cohort effects: newer generations entering the labor force carry lower unemployment propensities than the generations before them. That is a durable shift, not a temporary one.
Men's trend unemployment began to edge down in the early 1990s, while women's decline became clearer around 2000, with college-educated women starting earlier. The gender difference matters for the story, but the bigger aggregate driver remains age and education composition.
Hornstein and Kudlyak project that these demographic tailwinds will keep blowing. The trend unemployment rate is expected to drift down to about 4.4% by 2044, a further 0.4 percentage point drop. Aging and education will continue to shift the labor-force weight away from younger, higher-unemployment groups and toward older, more-educated workers. Aging does pull down overall labor force participation because older people are less likely to work, but it also lowers unemployment because those who stay in the workforce have very low jobless rates.
The paper's bottom-up approach estimates trends for 44 groups defined by age, gender, and education, then weights them by population shares. That method separates compositional change from genuine improvement within groups. The results suggest that the secular decline in unemployment is not a policy artifact or a statistical quirk. It is baked into the demographic structure of the country.
For markets and policymakers, the implication is that the labor market's floor is lower than it used to be. A 4% unemployment rate today does not signal the same degree of tightness it would have in the 1980s. The Fed's dual mandate runs through a labor market that is structurally different from the one the Taylor rule was built on. The research provides a framework for recalibrating that view.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.