
Binance pulled its Greek MiCA application as Ireland and Latvia also resisted. The one-shot passport forces regulators to weigh the US settlement and Zhao's influence against compliance rebuild.
Binance withdrew its MiCA application in Greece after reported resistance from regulators. The company told users the absence of a formal decision before the transition deadline forced it to seek authorization elsewhere. The withdrawal has been covered in detail in Binance Faces MiCA Crunch After Greece Application Withdrawal. Reports indicated talks with regulators in Ireland and Latvia also encountered friction, though Binance maintained that Greece was its only formal application.
ESMA has since directed unauthorized crypto-asset service providers to stop onboarding new EU clients and restrict existing services to exit and withdrawal activity, as reported in Binance to Restrict EU Onboarding and Services From July 1 Under MiCA.
A crypto-asset service provider license under MiCA is a fitness test administered by a national regulator. When approved, that license extends to all 27 EU member states through passporting. The regulator certifies the management body, qualifying shareholders, AML controls, custody systems, client-asset segregation, internal governance, and group structure are sound enough for cross-border operation. Article 62 of MiCA spells out what applicants must document. Article 63 gives national competent authorities grounds to refuse authorization when the management body threatens sound management, client interests, or market integrity, or poses a serious risk of money laundering and terrorist financing. Regulators can consult AML authorities and financial intelligence units before granting any license.
The US settlement is the primary piece of evidence regulators weigh. In November 2023, the Justice Department announced that Binance pleaded guilty and agreed to pay more than $4 billion to resolve violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, money transmission, and sanctions. Changpeng Zhao separately pleaded guilty to failing to maintain an effective AML program. Treasury's FinCEN settlement reached $3.4 billion and OFAC's $968 million, both accompanied by monitorship and compliance undertakings. The DOJ and Treasury findings directly address the same controls MiCA requires: AML systems, sanctions screening, management accountability, and group governance.
Binance argues it has rebuilt its compliance infrastructure, employing about 1,500 compliance staff and having no outstanding MiCA issues. The regulator's question is whether that rebuild is backed by evidence or merely asserted.
Europe's pre-MiCA history with Binance gave regulators in Greece, Ireland, and Latvia a file to consult. Binance exited the Netherlands in 2023 after failing to register, following a fine from the Dutch central bank for operating without authorization. In Germany, the company withdrew its BaFin custody-license application after regulators reportedly made clear they would not grant it. Belgium's FSMA ordered Binance to stop providing virtual-currency services from outside the European Economic Area, noting Binance had not demonstrated which legal entities were offering services or whether they were properly authorized. The FSMA also pointed to Binance's own terms, which referenced 27 corporate entities, 19 of them outside the EEA. French prosecutors opened a judicial probe in 2025 into allegations of money laundering and tax fraud, which Binance denied. MiCA consolidates that accumulated record into a single authorization decision that cannot be reversed at the border.
Zhao stepped down as CEO in November 2023 as part of the DOJ settlement. He remains a major beneficial owner. Reuters reported that European regulators were examining his continued influence over the company. Binance's EU regional head, Gillian Lynch, told Reuters that Zhao is fully removed from company management. MiCA's fitness standards go beyond job titles. They require regulators to assess whether management and qualifying shareholders exercise effective control consistent with sound governance, client protection, and market integrity. A European authority approving Binance must document and supervise a group structure that proves the EU entity is insulated from informal control, reputational contagion, or group-level interference from outside the bloc.
France, Italy, and Austria have each warned that differences in national supervision could allow crypto firms to choose the regulator that imposes the lightest scrutiny. French officials have explicitly described regulatory shopping as a search for the weakest link. A regulator in Greece, Ireland, or Latvia would carry a bloc-wide political judgment and would absorb reputational exposure if that decision later proved wrong. Reports noted that regulators in Ireland, Latvia, and Greece coordinated closely, pointing to a collective supervisory posture.
If any EU member state approves Binance after the company implements verifiable governance reforms, MiCA serves as a normalization path for large exchanges with compliance liabilities. If no regulator accepts that burden, the result is a sustained period of restricted EU activity. Binance users would be directed to sell or withdraw while competitors with existing MiCA licenses absorb European market share.
Chainalysis estimated that illicit cryptocurrency addresses received at least $154 billion in 2025, with stablecoins accounting for 84% of illicit transaction volume.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.