Stocks● Neutral
Why 2028 May Bring the Real Test for U.S. Elections
Armstrong revises election timeline: 2026 panic cycle and 2028 shift where neither major party wins, citing CIA tape and seat data.
Continue with
Martin Armstrong's latest commentary revisits his earlier claims about election interference and the model's projections, centering on a timeline that extends past the 2026 midterms to a potentially disruptive 2028 cycle. The piece draws on his proprietary economic confidence model and historical arrays, arguing that the 2020 contest was manipulated by neoconservative figures in the intelligence and foreign policy establishment, and that 2024 marked a turning point where those efforts failed.
Armstrong cites a 2023 panic cycle that hit on schedule, followed by a directional change in voter turnout data. His model, he says, projects another panic cycle in 2026 and a "seismic shift" in 2028 where neither major party wins a clear mandate. The third-party data registered a directional change, he adds, reinforcing his view that the two-party system is structurally breaking down.
The article takes aim at specific Biden administration officials–Antony Blinken, Victoria Nuland, Merrick Garland–all of whom Armstrong says claimed their families had been persecuted by Russians, a dynamic he ties directly to the U.S. proxy war in Ukraine via the Biden administration. He argues that without this personnel, the conflict would not have reached its current scale.