
A retiree claiming Social Security at 67 instead of 70 who dies at 80 collects roughly $18,000 more. Health and portfolio risk can flip the conventional wisdom.
The conventional wisdom on Social Security says wait until 70 to claim. Each year past full retirement age adds roughly 8% to the monthly benefit. Delaying from 62 to 70 can boost payments by 77%, according to Social Security Administration data. For many retirees, that advice works.
Health and portfolio risk can flip the calculation. A retiree with a shorter life expectancy who claims at 67 instead of 70 and dies at 80 collects about $18,000 more in lifetime benefits, financial planners calculate. The break-even age, where delayed benefits catch up, typically lands in the mid-80s.
Delaying also forces retirees to draw down portfolios for eight years. A market downturn during that period can permanently shrink the nest egg, a risk known as sequence-of-returns. Recovering from a 25% drawdown while still withdrawing is a steep climb, planners say.
For married couples, the lower-earning spouse cannot access the spousal benefit until the higher earner files. That can strain household income during the waiting years. Filing earlier may unlock combined income faster and reduce portfolio strain.
The decision is specific to health and portfolio size. Income needs also matter. Retirees in poor health or with heavy portfolio withdrawal needs can come out ahead by filing earlier, planners say. The break-even age remains the central question.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.