
A data-driven focus on confirming evidence, not alien theories, is the only path the advisory board should take.
The field is attracting more frauds, charlatans, and lunatics. Staying disciplined on data-driven questions matters most. The core issue: how many released and unreleased videos are backed by radar, satellite, eyewitness, and other confirming evidence? Confirming does not mean confirming they are aliens. It means confirming they are real phenomena, not illusions.
The discourse should not focus on aliens. Focus on whether the phenomena are real. If insiders are correct and the phenomena are real, the debate can shift to what they might be. Concrete evidence is something a committee can handle well. Trying to find agreement on aliens is a different task entirely.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.