
The high court's second refusal leaves intact the $5 million award, while a separate $83.3 million appeal over presidential immunity awaits a decision this fall.
The US Supreme Court for a second time refused to hear President Donald Trump's challenge to a jury verdict that found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation of writer E. Jean Carroll.
The rebuff leaves intact a $5 million award Carroll had already collected after the high court's June 29 rejection of Trump's initial appeal. Trump had asked the justices to take the unusual step of reconsidering that decision.
Separately, Trump is asking the court to overturn an $83.3 million jury verdict in a second defamation suit brought by Carroll. That appeal raises different legal questions because it centers on statements Trump made while he was president. The court will likely say this fall whether it will hear that case.
Trump's original appeal in the $5 million case raised technical evidentiary issues. He argued jurors should not have heard testimony about two prior alleged assaults or listened to the "Access Hollywood" tape where he bragged about grabbing women without consent.
In his rehearing petition, Trump tried to broaden the appeal by raising presidential immunity and linking it to the larger $83 million case. He contends he is immune from the second suit because his allegedly defamatory statements were official acts. That argument relies partly on the Supreme Court's 2024 ruling that gave presidents broad criminal immunity for official conduct.
Although the $5 million case covered comments Trump made between his two White House terms, he argued the jury's finding was tainted because the trial included some discussion of his presidential statements. He urged the court to at least delay finalizing the verdict until it resolves the larger appeal.
Carroll testified that Trump assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in 1996. Trump denied the allegations. Carroll said Trump defamed her by posting on social media in 2022 that her story was a "complete con job" and a "hoax."
The Supreme Court has not yet decided whether to hear the $83.3 million appeal; a decision is expected this fall.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.