
Megan Romer's disastrous New Yorker interview has DSA members questioning her leadership. Internal divisions widen as the left flank defends her and the right calls for replacement.
Megan Romer’s interview with The New Yorker editor David Remnick was a disaster for the Democratic Socialists of America, and the national co-chair is facing sharp internal criticism. The Forward asked what the DSA actually wants, concluding its co-chair couldn’t say. The Independent wrote that she sounded completely lost. Mediate said she stepped on a banana peel and tumbled into a thorny bush.
Inside the DSA, opinions of Romer’s performance were more nuanced. Some said they were happy with how she portrayed socialism on camera. The interview also concerned many inside a group desperate to keep itself unified amid explosive growth since 2024, when Zohran Mamdani launched his electrifying campaign for New York City mayor. “I do think she’s caused damage,” one DSA member in a position of leadership said. “People from all across the political left have been messaging me and some others, begging us to take her off the air.”
Romer had already gone viral weeks earlier on Fox News, giving one-word affirmative answers to questions about abolishing the presidency, borders, and prisons. That could be shrugged off as a right-wing trap. The New Yorker interview was harder to dismiss. Romer’s bubbly energy and bright-red eyeglasses clashed with Remnick’s calm, paternalistic tone. The editor spoke at times like a bored scholar holding office hours with a pupil. After the interview, Romer called Remnick a “debate bro” on X.
City & State reporter Peter Sterne, who covers the DSA and is a former member, said the questions “were hostile” but not necessarily bad. Romer made some eyebrow-raising statements, such as saying she “probably would have” attended the controversial pro-Palestinian rally held in New York City on October 8, 2023, if she’d been able to. The DSA did not organize that rally, which was criticized as condoning Hamas’s attack on Israel, but promoted it on social media before backpedaling with a statement calling for peace.
NYC-DSA member Eric Blanc said he was disappointed to hear Romer endorse the rally three years on. “We need to be really consistent about not giving any possible impression that fighting against the crimes of the Israeli government means in any way condoning what Hamas has done,” he said. “Megan, to her credit, at some points tried to push back a little bit against that, but then contradicted herself by saying, basically, we should still go to this rally.”
The DSA is not a monolith. Differences in ideology are encouraged. The organization contains everyone from FDR-style social Democrats to revolutionary Maoists, and includes caucuses that align with various beliefs. Romer is a member of Red Star, a Marxist-Leninist caucus on the left flank of the organization even more committed to Palestine than she was willing to publicly admit. Its post–October 7 statement was titled “We Do Not Condemn Hamas, and Neither Should You.”
The differences between national DSA and the New York chapter are especially pronounced. Writer and professor Nathan Newman wrote a Substack post titled “The Sane NYC DSA vs the Crazy National DSA–A Guide for the Perplexed.” “It’s almost hard to believe they’re the same organization,” he wrote. “The pragmatic politics of the New York City chapter, with its broad neighborhood alliances and its block-by-block canvassing and its willingness to back candidates who can actually win and then govern, is radically at odds with the national leadership of the DSA, which is dominated by sectarian ideologues and has at points actively worked to undermine the very approach that makes New York succeed.”
Opinions of Romer’s performance vary widely within the DSA. “Megan is a very important leader to many in DSA, particularly those on the more left-wing side, and they’re not going to critique her publicly, nor would I expect them to,” said a source in regional leadership. This source added that the “most vocal opposition” to the interview was coming from Socialist Majority Caucus and Groundwork, two large caucuses on the right flank of the DSA.
Romer has history with both. SMC and Groundwork each pushed for an unconditional endorsement of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s reelection campaign in 2024. After internal debate, the national chapter instead offered a conditional endorsement, then withdrew it days later, citing an insufficient commitment to the Palestinian cause. Caucuses like Red Star were key in the decision to distance the DSA from the most prominent democratic socialist in America.
The most common criticism of Romer’s interview from DSA members concerned her unpreparedness for certain questions. When Remnick asked whether she believed there should be millionaires in this country, she said she was more concerned about billionaires. She ran into trouble when she said she supported “taxing the hell out of millionaires,” and Remnick tried to pin her down on a number. “Well, what does taxing the hell out of them mean?” he said with a huff. Romer dragged her feet. “Uh, yeah, you know, again,” she said, “I don’t have a solid–” Remnick cut her off. “But shouldn’t you?” he asked. “Um, that’s a good question,” she replied. She never got around to answering the question.
This response, one of several from the interview to go viral, did not sit well with some in the DSA. “She couldn’t really answer some of the basic policy questions about taxing the rich, which is really our bread and butter,” said the first DSA leader. “I think that’s quite damning.”
Blanc said Romer wasn’t convincing enough for those on the outside. The interview “didn’t articulate socialist politics in a way that I think would bring people closer to DSA if you weren’t already on board,” he said. “There were multiple times where … Megan said things that were obviously going to give the enemies of socialism in the Democratic Party and the Republicans a field day.”
Romer doubled down on a wholly socialist America, defended abolishing the Senate, and said she opposed providing weapons to Ukraine. “We should be sending huge teams of diplomats,” Romer said. Remnick’s response: “Russia would get off of Ukraine’s back by us sending diplomats?”
While Romer’s answers accurately reflect the DSA’s stances, they’re easily mocked by the establishment when put forth so directly. “The circles of DSA members that I talked to and were texting about this were pretty upset, because they understand the stakes right now,” Blanc said. “You’re not really speaking to Remnick there. You’re not speaking to Fox News people. You’re trying to speak to the people who are potentially going to watch that.”
Sterne was more sympathetic. “There’s a tension between wanting to appear reasonable and trying to win people over without moving away from what DSA actually believes,” he said. “I’m not sure that there’s that much Megan could have done differently, because she does have to represent this large and sometimes unwieldy coalition of DSA’s internal politics.”
Despite the criticism of Romer within the DSA, there’s little chance she will be replaced as co-chair before her term ends next summer. Ousting her prematurely would require a two-thirds majority vote from the DSA’s National Political Committee, or NPC, and the right branch of the organization knows that even suggesting the idea would enrage the left flank. “She got by far the most votes during the co-chair elections last year,” Sterne said. “There is a lot of support for her. Even if people feel she’s not the strongest spokesperson, I think people are generally happy with her overall leadership of the organization.” NPC member Sidney Carlson White, representing the left-wing Marxist Unity Group, confirmed as much. “There’s been no outcry from any of the caucuses,” he said, adding that he thought the interview was “generally viewed positively by membership.”
Some members still hope for a sea change. “I think everyone thought she was doing a bad job, but it was sort of a ‘wait and see’ approach to assess the extent of the damage,” said the first DSA leader, who wants Romer gone. “As time has gone by, it does seem to be a serious issue.” The regional leader added: “I don’t think she has a strong vision for what DSA should be. On top of that, she doesn’t seem like a strong spokesperson either. So I do support replacing her.” The same source said they expected Romer to “pull back” from public appearances.
Grace Mausser, the co-chair of NYC-DSA and a member of SMC, said she empathized with Romer. Mausser has also acted as a de facto spokeswoman for the DSA, recently making appearances on CBS and Fox & Friends. “Until the last two years, almost none of us had big media experience or did a lot of press,” she said. “I may disagree with Megan on some things, but Megan … like all of us in DSA, is adjusting to a very sudden spotlight on our movement.”
Four days after the New Yorker interview, the DSA announced it was hiring a national press coordinator for the first time. “People feel that the co-chairs, both Megan and Ashik [Siddique], are doing their best,” Sterne said. “But there is a concern that they need better media training. Some people have also said maybe the co-chairs should not be the spokespeople.”
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.