
Globalt says the AI capex cycle has compressed the equity risk premium, making markets reward future growth over present cash flow. There is a risk that if AI returns disappoint, valuation compression could be sharp.
The equity market has entered a phase where present cash flow matters less than future dominance. That is the core takeaway from a new report by Globalt Investments, which argues that investors are increasingly rewarding companies that reinvest in artificial intelligence infrastructure over those that return capital to shareholders through dividends or buybacks.
Globalt analysts frame this as a repricing of risk. The equity risk premium – the gap between the S&P 500's earnings yield and long-term Treasury yields – has narrowed to levels rarely seen outside periods of elevated optimism. In plain terms, investors are accepting less compensation for holding stocks relative to bonds. That compression forces markets to rely more on distant growth assumptions than on current earnings.
The artificial intelligence investment cycle amplifies this shift. US corporations are committing hundreds of billions of dollars to data centers, custom chips, cloud capacity, and model training. Cash that in prior cycles would have flowed back to shareholders is now redirected into what many executives view as a once-in-a-generation technological opportunity.
Globalt notes an irony. The traditional appeal of dividends was never solely income; it was discipline. Management teams that regularly returned capital faced tighter scrutiny on spending. Today, markets are encouraging aggressive reinvestment because the perceived cost of underinvesting in AI is higher than the cost of overspending.
Who is exposed
The dynamic creates a divide. Companies with strong free cash flow and solid balance sheets can fund large AI projects while maintaining shareholder returns. Others face a choice: invest to compete or keep distributing cash. The report suggests that dividend-oriented strategies have struggled precisely because the market now values future opportunity over present cash flow.
The risk is that this preference becomes a source of vulnerability. If economic growth slows, financing costs stay elevated, or AI investments deliver uneven outcomes, investors may swing back toward cash generation and balance-sheet strength. Globalt draws a parallel to the late 1990s, when cash-generative businesses lagged during the dot-com boom but eventually reasserted themselves.
What would reduce the risk
A stabilization of the equity risk premium would signal that markets are no longer betting exclusively on distant growth. Evidence that AI capital spending is generating measurable returns – higher revenue, margin expansion, or sustained competitive advantage – would validate the current allocation. That would reduce the chance of a sharp re-rating.
What would worsen the risk
Continued compression of the risk premium, coupled with weak or unclear returns from AI projects, would leave the market overpaying for promises. A macroeconomic slowdown that pressures earnings would force a reassessment, and companies that neglected shareholder returns could see their stocks hit harder. The report emphasizes that not every dollar spent on AI will generate attractive long-term returns.
Globalt's conclusion is not that dividends are obsolete. Cash flow still matters. The question is whether investors are being adequately compensated for ignoring it today. These trends highlight the value of ongoing stock market analysis as the cycle unfolds.
The report was prepared by Globalt Investments, a registered investment adviser, and reflects the judgment of the author as of the date noted. It is not personalized investment advice.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.