
AI spending hits $725B a year, but revenue trails at $50-60B. The gap, now $600-700B, could hit Indian global fund investors with concentrated US tech exposure, Ametra's CIO warns.
Companies are spending hundreds of billions of dollars building AI infrastructure. The revenue those investments generate is a fraction of the cost, and the gap is widening.
Karan Aggarwal, co-founder and CIO at Ametra PMS, laid out the numbers. AI capital expenditure has reached roughly $725 billion a year. Current AI revenue runs between $50 billion and $60 billion. That works out to less than $1 of revenue for every $10 invested annually. And that is revenue, not profit.
The difference matters for Indian investors who hold global equity funds. Those portfolios are heavily concentrated in the US technology stocks driving the AI buildout.
Most large hyperscalers are channeling nearly all of their free cash flow into AI expansion. Some are borrowing or issuing equity to keep spending. Aggarwal said AI capex already accounts for 94% of hyperscaler free cash flow, a share he expects to rise to 157% by 2030. At that point, he said, the companies leading the AI race would become debt-laden operations burning cash on unproven growth.
Adoption is not the issue. Monetization is. Aggarwal cited an MIT NANDA study reported by Fortune that found 95% of generative AI pilots fail to reach production. On the consumer side, he pointed to NPR data showing only 3% of users pay for AI services. Sequoia Capital's estimates, he said, put the AI revenue shortfall at $125 billion in 2024 and approaching $600 billion to $700 billion now.
Aggarwal sees parallels to the internet boom of the late 1990s. "It seems very similar to the internet bubble of the early 2000s, where the internet saw widespread adoption but nearly 80% of internet firms went out of business," he said. Even the internet took nearly a decade before companies generated meaningful returns.
He also warned that AI remains a winner-take-all industry. One low-cost, equally efficient model from China, he said, could render trillions of AI capex useless.
Indian investors get overseas exposure through global mutual funds, ETFs and international feeder funds. The problem is concentration. Aggarwal noted that the top 10 companies account for more than 40% of the S&P 500's market capitalization, against a historical average of 20% to 25%. Most global equity funds have roughly 70% exposure to the US. Several emerging-market funds hold about 45% in Taiwan and South Korea, with three companies representing almost 32% of the portfolio weight.
US equity valuations leave little room for disappointment, he said. The market-cap-to-GDP ratio sits above 220, far above the historical comfort range of 80 to 120. The S&P 500's price-to-earnings ratio is near 30, a level last seen during the dot-com era.
"With the global equity boom revolving around unrealistic revenue expectations around AI adoption and the largest capex cycle in human history, there is very little margin of error," Aggarwal said. "Any setback in expectations can trigger a 2000 redux."
He added that Indian markets could see sharp valuation compression from bearish global cues. "When it comes to global investing, it is time for a more nuanced approach towards geographic diversification, with a focus on value plays across a wide universe of emerging and developed markets."
AI-led euphoria has made global markets increasingly concentrated, he said, making broad-based index investing alone a less effective strategy for diversification.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.