
IDC's 2,000-leader survey: 52% cite trust as the top AI adoption barrier, 12% have governance embedded. A Kinaxis-IDC webinar details the findings.
Kinaxis this week released IDC research showing supply chain leaders expect AI to take over planning decisions within two years, while most lack the governance to support the shift. The InfoBrief, "Making Supply Chain AI Accountable," surveyed more than 2,000 supply chain leaders across nine global markets.
AI adoption is close to universal among the respondents. Just 2% reported no AI-enabled capabilities, and only 12% described themselves as AI leaders. The harder number sits further down the maturity curve: just 6% of organizations say their supply chains operate autonomously at scale today, where AI makes planning decisions across the operation. Forty-one percent expect autonomous operations to become their core operating model within one to two years. If that expectation holds, the share of respondents running autonomous supply chains would rise to 41% from 6%, a near-sevenfold jump. Wrong calls in that setting cascade quickly; planning errors feed straight into procurement and production.
That ambition rests on a thin governance base. Only 12% of organizations have AI planning governance fully embedded in their operations, and 52% cite trust in AI-driven decisions as the top barrier to faster adoption. Trust is the most common constraint named in the survey. The leadership and governance figures land at the same 12%, though they come from separate questions.
Eric Thompson, research director for global supply chain planning at IDC, said the question now is accountability.
"The next phase of supply chain AI is not simply more adoption. It is accountability – ensuring AI delivers trusted decisions, measurable value, governed autonomy, and operational outcomes."
The 52% trust reading places the constraint on the demand side. The technology is installed at nearly every respondent; confidence in what it decides is another matter. IDC conducted the research independently; Kinaxis sponsored it.
Kinaxis (TSX:KXS), which sells supply chain planning and orchestration software, says the findings point to a clear need for explainable, auditable AI. Justin King, field chief technology officer, said the Maestro platform was built around the accountability question. Every AI-driven recommendation is "explainable and auditable before it acts," King said, so "accountability happens at the decision, not just the policy." Kinaxis describes Maestro as combining proprietary technologies for full visibility across the supply chain, covering multi-year strategic planning and last-mile delivery. In practice, recommendations carry a rationale that can be inspected, and the audit trail is set before the system acts.
The accountability question is not confined to supply chains. Who carries responsibility when an autonomous system makes a costly error remains unresolved. Financial services are working through the same issue; there, AI agents act without direct human oversight. AlphaScala's AI rogue agents analysis examines who bears liability when those systems cause a breach.
Kinaxis posted the full InfoBrief on its website. The webinar with Thompson and King follows; registration stays open until the session starts, and those who cannot join live receive the recording afterward.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.