
Senate Majority Leader John blocked the procedural vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act before the August recess. Ethics concerns over Trump's $1.4B crypto profit stall momentum.
Senate Majority Leader John blocked the procedural vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act that had been expected before the August recess. The decision, announced late Thursday, effectively ends any near-term path for the bill to become law this year. Supporters insist negotiations will continue when lawmakers return in mid-September.
The bill's path was already narrow. Even if a cloture vote had been scheduled, the number of unresolved issues made passage unlikely, according to legislative aides and industry sources who spoke with CoinDesk. The biggest sticking point has been President Donald Trump's crypto business ties, which alarmed Democrats as far back as the May 2025 negotiations on the GENIUS Act. Trump's disclosure of $1.4 billion in profit from his crypto ventures hardened those concerns. One source called it the "kill shot" for Friday's talks.
Other flashpoints remain. Law enforcement provisions and agriculture-related issues are still being debated. Separately, a growing number of lawmakers have raised questions about stablecoin yield and rewards. Taken together, the pile of outstanding issues would have made even a successful procedural vote difficult.
Senator Angela Alsobrook said in a statement that the goal remains to get the bill through. "We've worked for over a year on a bipartisan basis to protect consumers, limit deposit flight, fight illicit finance and include a fair deal on ethics," she said. "We will continue our work – getting Clarity Act right remains our goal."
Senator Cynthia Lummis posted a similar message. "We've come too far to quit now." She added that the industry deserves clear rules, consumers deserve protection, and law enforcement needs the right tools.
Industry participants are more divided on the odds. One person tracking the bill said convincing enough Democrats to vote yes will require the White House to agree to a substantive change in the ethics language. Democrats who would otherwise support the bill are unlikely to move at this stage, the person said. A Senate staffer told CoinDesk a "legitimate" deal is needed to secure Democratic votes.
There was talk that a vote, even if unsuccessful, would put lawmakers on the record before the election, potentially shaping how Fairshake and other crypto PACs spend their funds. A source familiar with the matter blamed Democrats for the lack of a vote, saying it would have pushed campaign dollars away from them. A second staffer pushed back, noting that Republicans have also raised concerns. "The blame cannot be laid at either major party," the staffer said.
Senator Thom Tillis told Politico that "the odds drop precipitously," citing the election and the long recess.
Two other people who spoke with CoinDesk said the bill still has a legitimate shot. The August deadline, they noted, was more of what the crypto industry wanted than a hard stop. What that shot looks like depends on what the Senate can negotiate in the next five weeks.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.