
SEBI accepted NSE's ₹1,491 crore settlement for co-location and dark fibre cases after two decades. Legal experts say delayed justice dilutes deterrence, and urge faster, more transparent enforcement.
India's market regulator accepted the National Stock Exchange's application to settle the co-location and dark fibre cases, with the exchange paying ₹1,491 crore. The co-location case, investigated by multiple agencies for over two decades, alleged that certain brokers got preferential access to market data. The dark fibre matter involved preferential connectivity through the exchange's fibre network.
The prolonged delay in closing such cases by investigating agencies, the regulator, and the judiciary makes penalties appear less stringent than the crime, legal experts said.
Sonam Chandwani, Managing Partner at KS Legal & Associates, said there is a legitimate concern that the deterrent value of enforcement may be diluted when matters involving significant market impact remain unresolved for years and are settled on terms that appear modest compared with the alleged gains or the scale of the violation. A delayed resolution coupled with relatively low monetary consequences can create a perception that regulatory risk is manageable and may inadvertently embolden non-compliant market participants, she said. The larger issue is whether the enforcement framework ensures violations are detected swiftly, wrongdoers are deprived of economic benefit, and sanctions are stringent enough to outweigh potential gains from misconduct, she added.
Nirali Mehta, Partner at Mindspright Legal, said a regulator's approach in a particular case depends on several factors such as the entity's role, degree of culpability, investor harm, extent of unlawful gain, mitigating factors, cooperation during the investigation, and past actions. The appropriateness of actions taken by SEBI and procedural loopholes have been contentious issues for challenging SEBI's orders before the Tribunal and the High Courts, he said.
Abhiraj Arora, Partner at Saraf and Partners, said the NSE matter should be viewed in the broader context as it travelled from SEBI to the Securities Appellate Tribunal and then to the Supreme Court. In orders where disgorgement runs into crores, the economic consequence can itself be significantly greater than the penalty, he added.
Pradyun Chakravarty, Partner at King Stubb & Kasiva, said when the money made from wrongdoing looks many times larger than the money paid in penalty, it is fair to ask whether the punishment actually stings enough to change behaviour. Disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, bans from the market, tighter compliance rules and governance overhauls often hurt more than the fine, he said. SEBI could help itself by being more transparent about how it arrives at settlement figures and by moving faster on these cases, Chakravarty added.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.