
The Supreme Court dismissed a bid to revoke a Will after relatives ignored a mutation notice. The ruling affirms that silence during property record updates bars later challenges.
The Supreme Court dismissed a bid by relatives to revoke the probate of a Will that made a nephew the sole beneficiary of his aunt's estate. The ruling turned on a procedural detail: the relatives had received a formal notice when the nephew applied for mutation of the property records after obtaining probate. They did not file any objection at that time.
Years later, the relatives petitioned to revoke the probate, arguing the Will was not genuine. The court rejected the case, holding that by ignoring the mutation notice and failing to object when the record was being updated, the relatives had effectively accepted the Will's validity. The principle of acquiescence applied, the court said.
The properties in question included assets covered by a 1978 gift deed from the aunt, Smt Sen, to the nephew, Mr Dutta. The Will covered the remaining estate. The Calcutta High Court had earlier dismissed the relatives' challenge, and the Supreme Court affirmed that decision.
The ruling reinforces a basic point of estate litigation: a party that sits on its rights during the mutation process cannot revive them years later. The relatives' delay, the court found, was not explained by any new evidence or fraud. The probate stands.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.