
The Supreme Court agreed to examine a PIL arguing Jantar Mantar is no longer a suitable protest venue, citing disruptions to residents and essential services.
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a public interest litigation arguing that Jantar Mantar, the historic protest venue in central Delhi, is no longer a suitable location for demonstrations. The petition, filed by Satish Chand Kaushik, contends that protests there cause inconvenience to local residents and disrupt the supply of essential goods and medical services.
A bench led by the Chief Justice, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, issued notices to the Centre and other respondents. The court asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to obtain instructions from the authorities on the issues raised.
During the hearing, the Chief Justice said the petition raised concerns about access and movement in the area. "It has been stated in the plea that Jantar Mantar is not a proper site anymore for such protests due to ingress and egress issues. Supply of medical essentials etc. I think this is important... Please take instructions, Mr Solicitor. Issue notice and list this separately," the CJI said.
The petitioner's counsel also referenced a proposed political march, arguing that "Arvind Kejriwal called a town hall and decided to march to the Prime Minister's residence," and said that "another July 20 incident should be avoided". The bench declined to comment on the proposed event. "They know how to handle it. If they cannot, come to us for mishandling. I am sure they will handle (it)," the CJI said.
The matter has been directed to be listed separately for further hearing.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.