
Rippling fires back at Runlayer's trade secret lawsuit, alleging patent infringement in Delaware court. Insider's text message is now disputed, with the engineer saying he was misquoted.
The legal battle between HR software provider Rippling and AI startup Runlayer escalated Monday. Rippling filed a patent infringement lawsuit in U.S. District Court for Delaware, accusing the New York company of copying its technology.
Runlayer's platform "infringes Rippling's patents, steals its intellectual property, and drafts off the substantial time and resources Rippling spent developing this technology over the past decade," the complaint states. Runlayer, backed by tech billionaire Vinod Khosla, is accused of "free-riding" on Rippling's patented software, causing "actual damages in the form of lost sales, lost customers, and price erosion."
The counterclaim follows Runlayer's trade secret lawsuit last month. Runlayer alleged Rippling stole its proprietary information to "build essentially a clone" of its safety and governance product during a commercial partnership. Rippling denied those claims in separate court filings.
"It takes a certain boldness to accuse a competitor of violating intellectual property laws while infringing on that competitor's inventions," a Rippling spokesperson said. "Having manufactured claims against Rippling to distract from its business failures, it now has to face a lawsuit for repeatedly copying Rippling's inventions in building its own products."
Runlayer CEO Andrew Berman rejected the counterclaim as retaliation. "This is a desperate, retaliatory ploy to distract from the fact Rippling misappropriated our proprietary technology," Berman said. "We clearly have a standout AI product that has nothing to do with these patents. No attempt to bully or distract will prevent us from protecting our IP and continuing to innovate and create the best product for our fast-growing customer base."
The original dispute centers on an MCP Gateway, a product that provides an extra governance layer between AI models and their servers. Runlayer claimed it was tipped off on June 12 when a Rippling insider texted Berman: "There's been a project internally to build essentially a clone of Runlayer... It's not feature complete by any means, it's almost a 1 to 1 copy of Runlayer."
That insider, Rippling engineer Tim Fall, said in a new declaration that his messages were misinterpreted. "Now that I have seen and used Rippling's MCP Gateway, it is clear to me that it is not a 'clone' and did not copy the Runlayer MCP Gateway," Fall wrote. "I would not make those statements knowing what I know now, as they are not correct." He added that he does not recall receiving "any source code, system architecture, or back-end details for the Runlayer MCP Gateway" during the companies' relationship. Fall has been at Rippling for a year and a half.
Rippling, in an opposition filing last Friday, argued "Mr. Fall's imprecise text message debunked, Runlayer's case collapses." The filing stated there is "no evidence that Runlayer shared trade secrets with Rippling" and "no evidence that Rippling used any Runlayer trade secrets."
A source familiar with the case said Rippling "did not invent anything in the MCP industry, so their arguments don't really work here. The patents simply don't apply."
Rippling's case against Runlayer centers on patent infringement, a different legal theory than Runlayer's trade secret claims. The Delaware court will weigh both sets of allegations as discovery proceeds.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.