
Polymarket paid creators for bets they did not win, a WSJ investigation found. The platform ended the practice but faces regulatory scrutiny over its prediction markets.
Polymarket paid some of its top content creators for bets they did not actually win, according to a Wall Street Journal investigation published Tuesday.
The prediction-market platform gave cash payments to roughly a dozen creators who posted about their winning wagers on social media, the WSJ reported, citing internal company records and people familiar with the matter. In several cases, the creators had not placed the bets they promoted.
The payments ranged from a few hundred dollars to tens of thousands of dollars, the report said. Polymarket did not disclose the payments as sponsored content, the WSJ found.
Polymarket said in a statement that it had ended the practice and that the payments were part of a marketing program that did not violate any laws. The company said it had not intentionally misled users.
The WSJ investigation focused on Polymarket's "creator program," which paid influencers to post about their betting activity on the platform. Some creators fabricated their results, the report said, posting screenshots of winning bets they had not placed.
Polymarket's terms of service prohibit users from posting false or misleading content. The company said it had terminated relationships with creators who violated the policy.
The report comes as Polymarket faces increased scrutiny from regulators. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has been investigating whether the platform's event contracts violate federal gambling laws.
Polymarket has said it operates legally under a no-action letter from the CFTC. The company has raised more than $70 million from investors including Peter Thiel's Founders Fund.
The WSJ said it reviewed internal Polymarket documents showing the company tracked creator performance and paid bonuses for posts that generated engagement. The documents did not show that Polymarket verified whether the bets were real.
Polymarket's creator program was designed to drive traffic to the platform, the WSJ reported. The company paid creators based on the number of clicks and new users their posts generated.
Some creators who received payments had no history of placing bets on Polymarket, the WSJ found. Others had placed small bets but promoted them as large wins.
Polymarket said it had since implemented new verification procedures for its creator program. The company declined to say how many creators remained in the program.
The CFTC declined to comment on the WSJ report. Polymarket's legal status has been a subject of debate since the 2020 election, when the platform drew attention for its prediction markets on presidential race outcomes.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.