
Industry groups and Manila Electric Co. urge careful study of President Marcos' proposal to remove systems loss charges, warning of technical and financial risks.
Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. called for energy reforms in his State of the Nation Address on Monday, including the removal of the systems loss charge that consumers pay on electricity bills. The reaction from the industry was measured, with utilities and energy groups urging a careful study before any legislative change.
Systems loss, the electricity lost during transmission and distribution, has been a point of contention. Distribution firms like Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) are allowed to recover a portion of that loss from consumers under the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (Epira) and the Anti-Pilferage Act. The charge is capped at 6.5% of delivered energy, set by the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC).
Marcos also pushed for the passage of the Sariling Kuryente Act, which aims to make rooftop solar panels and battery storage more affordable for households. The Department of Energy (DOE) said it fully supports the president's direction. Energy Secretary Sharon Garin said the department stands ready to translate those priorities into concrete programs, investments, and legislative reforms.
Meralco executive vice president and chief operating officer Ronnie Aperocho said the company respects the policy move but noted that system loss is a common operational aspect of electricity delivery. He said Meralco has invested in network modernization to keep its own losses well below the 6.5% cap. The company said it would participate actively in the discussions as the proposed amendments are deliberated, adding that any reforms should support the ability of distribution utilities to invest in infrastructure and system resilience.
Developers of Renewable Energy for AdvanceMent Inc. President Jose Layug called for an in-depth study. He said system loss has two components: technical losses, as energy turns into heat flowing through wires and transformers, and non-technical losses, such as theft and illegal tapping. Eliminating the charge entirely, he argued, could overlook the technical reality that some losses are inherent.
Philippine Energy Efficiency Alliance President Alexander Ablaza said the distinction between technical and non-technical losses matters. He said removing the charge completely is a technical impossibility, but capping it progressively is possible. He pointed to a pending house bill, HB 4599, that would address the cap. He added that the president's directive could focus on cracking down on non-technical losses like theft and meter reading errors.
The ERC said it welcomed the proposal and affirmed support for reforms that reduce unnecessary costs while ensuring the viability of distribution utilities. The commission said it stands ready to work with Congress, the DOE, and industry stakeholders.
The DOE noted that Marcos also highlighted energy security and a diversified energy mix. The department said ongoing projects would add nearly 10,000 megawatts of generation capacity and more than 1,700 megawatts of energy storage systems. Marcos reaffirmed the Philippines' commitment to deeper regional cooperation through the Asean Petroleum Security Framework and the future Asean Power Grid.
The risk for utilities like Meralco lies in the speed and scope of reform. If Congress eliminates the systems loss charge without a corresponding cap on non-technical losses or a mechanism to fund grid upgrades, distribution utilities could face a revenue gap. That could reduce their ability to invest in modernizing infrastructure and maintaining reliability. On the other hand, a calibrated approach that targets only theft and inefficiencies, while allowing recovery of technical losses, would preserve utility finances while lowering consumer bills.
A rushed measure that removes the charge entirely could push utilities to raise base rates to compensate, possibly offsetting the benefit to consumers. A slower process with industry input could yield a more durable outcome. For now, the legislative timeline is unclear. Congress has yet to schedule hearings on the proposed amendments.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.