Back to Markets
Stocks● Neutral
OpenAI IPO Filing Tests $150B Valuation Against AI Peer
OpenAI files confidential IPO with SEC one week after Anthropic. The $150B valuation faces a 40x revenue multiple test as two AI prospectuses arrive in quick succession.
Continue with
OpenAI has confidentially filed a draft registration statement for its initial public offering with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The filing sets up what could be the largest technology IPO in years, coming roughly one week after rival Anthropic submitted its own confidential IPO paperwork. The concentrated wave of AI company listings will test investor appetite for high-revenue, high-burn business models.
The confidential filing means OpenAI's financials, risk factors, and use-of-proceeds plan remain sealed until the company chooses to make them public, typically 15 to 21 days before the roadshow begins. The SEC's confidential filing process, available under the JOBS Act for companies with under $1.07 billion in annual revenue, allows issuers to refine their prospectus without public scrutiny. OpenAI's revenue has been reported by multiple outlets to exceed that threshold, so the confidential filing may indicate the company is still finalizing its revenue recognition methodology or addressing SEC comments on its business model.
Why the Anthropic Filing Creates a Sequencing Problem
Anthropic's confidential filing roughly one week before OpenAI's creates a sequencing problem for institutional investors. Most IPO allocations are decided by a small group of anchor investors who can absorb large blocks of shares. Those same investors now face two AI IPO prospectuses in rapid succession, each with different revenue profiles, burn rates, and valuation expectations.
OpenAI reported annualized revenue of roughly $3.7 billion as of late 2024, according to published reports, with the majority coming from ChatGPT subscriptions and API access. Anthropic's revenue is estimated at roughly $1 billion on an annualized basis, primarily from API usage by enterprise clients. The valuation gap is wide: OpenAI's last private secondary transactions valued the company at roughly $150 billion, while Anthropic's last funding round valued it at roughly $18 billion.
The risk for both companies is that investors treat them as substitutes rather than complements. If anchor investors allocate capital to the first filer, the second filer may face a thinner book and a lower pricing range. The one-week gap between filings compresses the window for investors to perform due diligence on both companies simultaneously.
Revenue Quality and the Subscription vs. API Mix
OpenAI's revenue mix carries different quality signals than Anthropic's. Subscription revenue from ChatGPT Plus and Team plans is recurring and predictable, with monthly billing cycles and relatively low churn. API revenue, by contrast, is usage-based and tied to developer activity, which can fluctuate with product releases, pricing changes, and competition from open-source models.
Anthropic's revenue is more heavily weighted toward API consumption by enterprise clients, which typically involves longer sales cycles but higher contract values. The company's Claude model family has gained traction in regulated industries such as healthcare and legal services, where data privacy requirements favor a closed-source API model over consumer-facing chatbots.
For IPO investors, the key metric will be gross margin on each revenue stream. Subscription platforms typically run gross margins of 70% to 80% once infrastructure costs are amortized. API businesses face higher variable costs from compute usage, which can compress gross margins to 50% or below during periods of rapid model training and deployment.