
A prosecution witness said only VP Sara Duterte and her former security officer knew how P500M in OVP confidential funds were spent. COA found no misuse, the witness added. The trial continues.
MANILA. Only Vice President Sara Duterte and her former security officer Col. Raymund Dante Lachica knew how the P500 million confidential funds of the Office of the Vice President were spent, a prosecution witness told the impeachment trial on Wednesday.
OVP Assistant Chief of Staff Lemuel Ortonio testified on the 19th day of the trial that he understood Duterte, as head of the agency, would have known how activities financed through the confidential funds were carried out. “The way I understand it, as the head of the agency, I would understand that she knows the implementation,” Ortonio said when asked if Duterte knew how the funds were spent.
Ortonio also confirmed that Lachica knew because he headed the OVP’s security operations. Presiding Officer Chiz Escudero pressed the point after an exchange between private prosecutor Mae Divinagracia and defense lawyer Kristine Ferrer. “You as assistant chief of staff, and the chief of staff herself doesn’t know; and Colonel Lachica… who is not part of the OVP, knows?” Escudero asked.
Ortonio said Duterte, as head of the agency, bore the most responsibility in the request, use, and justification of confidential funds. He agreed with Senator-Judge Risa Hontiveros that Duterte needed to know what was happening, particularly the implementation of the office’s activities.
When asked if he, former chief of staff Zuleika Acosta, and Lachica were part of Duterte’s “circle of trust,” Ortonio said, “I can only answer for myself. In terms of working relationships, I would say that I have the trust and confidence of the vice president in terms of doing duties that are assigned to me.” He could not categorically say whether Acosta and Lachica were in that circle, but noted both were entrusted with duties.
Ortonio said he was available when Acosta asked him to accompany her in encashing the funds, but did not join her when the money was later turned over to Lachica.
Earlier Wednesday, Ortonio testified that Commission on Audit observation memorandums on the OVP’s confidential funds did not indicate misuse. “Based on my understanding, ma'am, no misuse,” Ortonio told defense counsel Ferrer when asked if the AOMs contained any finding that the funds had been misused. He said he could not recall any finding of misuse in the Notice of Suspension covering the OVP’s fourth-quarter 2022 confidential funds, adding that it contained only requests for clarification. The AOMs and Notice of Suspension were not final findings by COA’s Intelligence and Confidential Fund Audit Unit because the OVP was given an opportunity to submit comments.
The testimony came as the defense sought to establish the nature of COA’s findings on the confidential funds. The trial is scheduled to continue, with no date set for a verdict.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.