
Natural gas gapped below $2.82 support, touching $2.77 as an expanding triangle pattern points to a potential retest of the $2.65 trend low. Momentum favors sellers.
Natural gas sellers drove the market to a fresh corrective low Monday, gapping through the $2.82 support zone and touching $2.77 before settling near session lows. The move extends a bearish correction that has now broken an established floor, putting the $2.65 trend low in clear view.
The breakdown came through the lower boundary of an expanding triangle pattern that has defined the past two weeks of trade. Expanding triangles reduce the reliability of any single breakout, but Monday's gap and close near the low give the bears an edge. The top of the pattern was confirmed by intraday rejections on Thursday and Friday, each stopping near $2.98, just below the 20-day moving average at $2.97. That average is declining, adding overhead weight to any bounce attempt.
The support zone from $2.82 to $2.74 – which held through last week's choppy trade – gave way quickly on the open. A daily close below $2.80 would confirm the breakdown as structural rather than a false move. Below that, the 88.6% Fibonacci retracement sits at $2.74, a level that may provide a brief pause before the next leg lower. The ultimate target remains the $2.65 low, and the bearish signals accumulating over the past week put that level at risk.
A bounce from current levels is possible; the lower boundary of the expanding triangle has produced intraday reversals before. But each successive rally has drawn sellers at a lower high, and the 20-day moving average rejection on Friday capped the last attempt at $2.98. Momentum is shifting decisively to the downside, and until natural gas reclaims $2.82 on a closing basis, the path of least resistance points lower.
For traders tracking the setup, the next forex market hours session will test whether the gap lower draws in fresh sellers or triggers a short-covering bounce. Either way, the expanding triangle's resolution appears to be resolving in favor of the bears.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.