
The Misesian's Ryan McMaken writes that the Declaration celebrates rebellion against state power, not national unity, with implications for tax and regulatory debates.
The Misesian, a libertarian quarterly, published an editorial by Ryan McMaken in its May/June 2026 issue arguing that modern Independence Day celebrations have inverted the original meaning of the Declaration of Independence.
McMaken writes that the Declaration was a statement of secession and rebellion, not national unity. He points to Thomas Jefferson's later support for secession movements and John Adams' view of the day as a celebration of revolution against the British state. "It was not a proclamation of a new America under a single state," McMaken wrote. "It was, rather, a declaration of disobedience and of political fragmentation."
The editorial contrasts the Declaration with the Constitution of 1787, which McMaken describes as a counterrevolution designed to impose a centralized government on the free states. He cites Murray Rothbard's characterization of the American Revolution as a "truly libertarian revolution" against imperialism.
McMaken criticizes modern commentators who celebrate the U.S. government and military on Independence Day, as well as scholars who use the Declaration to justify strong government. He argues that the "most direct and plain interpretation" of the document is about breaking "the political bands" that tie one polity to another. If Americans celebrated the real ideals of the Declaration, he writes, they would be "much closer to casting off the tax-funded parasite class."
The issue also includes two book reviews by David Gordon on misinterpretations of the Revolution and the Declaration.
For markets, the editorial highlights a persistent ideological tension that shapes debates over tax policy, regulation, and the size of government. Investors tracking political risk sometimes monitor libertarian and anti-federal sentiment as a leading indicator of tax revolts or deregulation campaigns. The Misesian's argument reflects a strain of thought that influences policy discussions on federal spending and regulatory reform.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.