
MCSA dropped its earlier stance on the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, now neutral as Congress debates the broader Clarity Act.
Alpha Score of 54 reflects moderate overall profile with moderate momentum, moderate value, weak quality. Based on 3 of 4 signals — score is capped at 90 until remaining data ingests.
The Major County Sheriffs of America dropped its earlier stance on the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. The group now holds a neutral position during ongoing discussions of the broader Clarity Act, according to a post from Fox Business reporter Eleanor Terrett.
Section 604 of the Clarity Act, also called the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, aims to clarify which blockchain developers and service providers fall outside securities laws. The MCSA had previously taken a position on the provision. Its shift to neutral does not signal approval or opposition, Terrett said. It reflects continued engagement as lawmakers weigh input from law enforcement, industry groups, and regulators.
The Senate Banking Committee advanced the Clarity Act with bipartisan support earlier this year. Since then, legislators have been reviewing sections of the bill, including Section 604. The MCSA's neutral stance is one data point in those deliberations.
For market participants tracking digital asset legislation, the Clarity Act is one of the most consequential bills in Congress. It would set jurisdiction boundaries between the SEC and CFTC and create compliance standards for crypto firms. The fate of Section 604 matters for blockchain developers who want a clear exemption from securities registration.
Discussions continue. The Senate is expected to hold further markup sessions before a floor vote. No date has been set.
For more on the broader legislative push, see our coverage of the CLARITY Act Gains Law Enforcement Support, Ethics Fight Looms.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.