
Forrester's new research maps AEGIS controls to 23 technology domains for securing agentic AI, showing where existing tools cover gaps and where new investment is needed.
Agentic AI creates control, technology, and purchasing problems. Security leaders need to know which controls they must satisfy, which technologies can satisfy them, where existing tools already provide coverage, and where a new investment actually fills a gap. Far too often, clients conduct that process in reverse order, trying to buy a technology and then mapping it to controls.
Most AEGIS guidance sessions eventually reach the same set of questions: which technologies do we need, which controls do they satisfy, and which vendors should we examine first?
Our latest research, Navigate AEGIS Technologies To Secure Agentic AI, maps AEGIS controls to technologies, functionality, and vendors. We did this to give clients a cleaner, more effective path to follow for securing agentic AI.
Securing agentic AI does not mean that security teams have to discard their existing tech stack and start over. Many of the capabilities needed to secure agentic AI already exist in existing security tools, especially if you work with the large, acquisitive security platform vendors.
The problem comes from determining where that existing coverage ends and what to prioritize. To help address this, the report sorts the list by Must Have Now, Should Have Next, and Specialized and High Assurance Use Cases.
Some familiar technologies now support AI-specific use cases. Others provide only part of the required control. New categories fill gaps created by autonomous agents, tool calls, delegated permissions, model dependencies, and near instantaneous decisions.
A useful technology map should answer seven questions for each category. Our new Navigate research covers 23 technology domains across the agentic AI stack. These domains include immediate priorities such as AI runtime security, AI detection and response, DLP for AI, AI security posture management, AI identity and access management, and AI GRC.
Security technology research usually starts with a product category. Buyers read a definition, review a market, compare vendors, and then try to connect the category back to a real control gap. Our Navigate research allows teams to reverse that sequence.
This report gives you a practical decision path through its methodology. Assume an organization identifies gaps in AEGIS controls covering runtime monitoring, unsafe agent behavior, prompt injection, data exfiltration, or high-risk tool actions. These use cases are satisfied by AI runtime security.
AI runtime security monitors AI applications and agents while they execute. It collects model and tool-call telemetry, detects activity such as prompt injection, jailbreaks, data exfiltration, and anomalous actions, then applies policies to block, contain, redact, limit, or escalate the activity. It may run at an AI gateway, API proxy, application runtime, agent framework plug-in, sidecar, or another inline enforcement point.
The report shows where AI runtime security overlaps with technologies such as AI Detection and Response, AI DLP, and AI security posture management. That gives security leaders an opportunity to inspect their existing security tools before opening a new procurement cycle. Control mapping helps security leaders understand those boundaries before they commit budget.
Forrester's AEGIS framework gives security leaders a way to define those guardrails across agent behavior, delegated authority, data exposure, tool use, model dependencies, and incident response. The next job is converting those guardrails into architecture and investment decisions. That means linking each control to the technologies that can enforce, monitor, govern, or validate it.
Start with the control gap. Trace it to the relevant technology categories. Check where existing tools already cover the requirement. Then decide whether to configure, combine, buy, replace, or wait.
Read the full report for all the insights and a deep dive into the methodology, technologies, and vendors solutions. Forrester clients with questions related to this research can connect with me through an inquiry or guidance session. Stay tuned for updates from the Forrester blogs.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.