
Lummis rejected Warren's warning that the Clarity Act creates illicit-finance loopholes, citing 16 statutory safeguards including Sections 201, 303 and 305. Warren had pointed to $3.84 billion routed by Iranian groups through CoinEx.
Senator Cynthia Lummis pushed back against Elizabeth Warren's warning that the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act, known as the Clarity Act, would create loopholes for illicit finance. Lummis argued the bill contains more than 16 statutory safeguards, including provisions in Sections 201, 303 and 305.
Warren had sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, urging the administration to oppose the legislation. She cited $3.84 billion that she said Iranian groups routed through the crypto exchange CoinEx, calling the Clarity Act a "dangerous gift" to hostile foreign actors. Warren's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Lummis's rebuttal.
Lummis, in a statement released Friday, said the bill's existing protections are stronger than what opponents describe. She pointed to Section 201, which requires exchanges to register with the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. Section 303 mandates know-your-customer checks for all transactions above a certain threshold. Section 305, she said, imposes reporting obligations for suspicious activity that mirror those under the Bank Secrecy Act.
The exchange highlights the deepening divide in Congress over how to regulate digital assets. Warren has long pushed for stricter anti-money laundering rules, including her own Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act. Lummis, a Republican from Wyoming, has championed the Clarity Act as a way to bring crypto firms under a clear federal framework while preserving innovation.
Warren's letter cited the $3.84 billion figure from a Chainalysis report that linked Iranian hacking groups to CoinEx, a Hong Kong-based exchange. The Treasury Department had sanctioned CoinEx in 2023, alleging it allowed users in Iran to trade crypto despite U.S. sanctions. Lummis did not dispute the figure but argued that the Clarity Act would not have prevented the Treasury's existing sanctions powers.
"The Clarity Act strengthens, not weakens, the tools already available to law enforcement," Lummis said in the statement. "The 16 safeguards are drawn from the Bank Secrecy Act, the Patriot Act, and current FinCEN guidance." She did not list all 16 provisions but said Sections 201, 303 and 305 are representative of the bill's approach.
The bill has passed the House Financial Services Committee on a party-line vote and awaits a floor vote. No date has been set. Lummis is also working on a companion version in the Senate, though it faces opposition from Warren and other Democrats who want stricter rules.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.