
Dutch trustee sold seized crypto for €2.2M; customer deposits estimated at €10-12M. Customers owned euro claims, not coins. Owner disputes figures; FIOD probe ongoing.
Dutch prosecutors sold the cryptocurrency seized from collapsed platform Knaken for €2.2 million, or about $2.5 million, court-appointed trustee Carl Hamm said. Thousands of customers who deposited an estimated €10 million to €12 million could face heavy losses.
Hamm, the Rotterdam trustee supervising the wind-down, said he is still looking for cash elsewhere and for anyone who owes Knaken money. Beyond the customers, he said, there are hardly any other creditors, aside from a possible slice of unpaid payroll tax.
Hamm wrote to about 6,300 people who recently held a position with the firm. He warned them not to expect to get much back. The gap between the sale proceeds and customer deposits implies a shortfall of several million euros, Hamm said.
The app enabled people in the Netherlands to buy and trade crypto. It never had the license required by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets. On July 16, a Rotterdam court declared Knaken Cryptohandel B.V. and its related Stichting Knaken Payments bankrupt.
Hamm described how the service worked. A customer putting €100 into Bitcoin would see €1 go to Knaken as a fee, with the remaining €99 used to open a position on an exchange. That position was in the name of Knaken. Customers saw the balance of crypto increase in the app. What they owned was a claim on the value in euros, not the coins. Many assumed the tokens belonged to them.
Hamm said Knaken did not seem to have held crypto that matched the balances users were shown. Trading and day-to-day costs had for a long time run into “one pot” while the business lost money.
Owner Ronald J. transferred €2.3 million from a company account to a company he controlled. The court called the transfer a conflict of interest.
Records trace Knaken’s troubles back to 2020, when 23 bitcoins were taken in a hack. J. blamed the theft for a loss of many millions of euros. The stolen coins were valued at roughly €140,000 at 2020 prices. In the years that followed, the company signed up to sponsor football clubs, including Feyenoord, Sparta, Heracles, Heerenveen, and briefly Ajax. It continued to sell certificates and let customers lend it money. It did not flag its financial problems to central bank supervisor De Nederlandsche Bank.
One of the customers’ lawyers challenged the right of justice officials to liquidate the holdings. “Whose crypto was it?” he asked, likening it to a garage going bust and selling the car left parked there while the owner sees “nothing of it.”
Prosecutors said there were good reasons for the sale and have refused to elaborate. Hamm said they likely invoked Article 117 of the Dutch Code of Criminal Procedure, which provides for the sale of seized goods susceptible to depreciation. Crypto prices are volatile, Hamm said, and had the coins not been sold and then fallen, the shortfall would only have grown.
Ronald J. said he does not acknowledge the €10 million to €12 million figure and cannot explain how it was arrived at. Knaken worked as a broker, he said. The customer entered a buy order, and it was filled at the going rate, with the matched position ending up in that customer’s account.
He called Hamm’s suggestion that the money was never actually put into crypto “pertinent onjuist” and damaging. He added that every order went through the firm’s liquidity provider and had an order ID with an executed price and timestamp that could be checked against the customer’s instruction.
J. also said he is still working toward a settlement with creditors that could speed up the wind-down.
A separate criminal investigation by Dutch fraud agency FIOD remains open. FIOD raided the premises on June 29, seizing devices and assets. No arrests were made.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.