
Chennai ITAT allowed a retired ONGC employee full ₹19.06 lakh leave encashment exemption, ruling the ₹25 lakh cap applies to PSU retirees under Section 10(10AA)(ii). Others can now reopen assessments.
A retired ONGC employee won a tax dispute that could shift how public sector retirees file leave encashment claims. The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal granted Balasubramanian Venkatachalaperumal an exemption on the full ₹19.06 lakh he received at retirement in FY20, setting aside the tax department's restriction to ₹3 lakh.
Venkatachalaperumal challenged the department's order after it added the difference to his taxable income, pushing it to ₹47.68 lakh from the ₹31.62 lakh he reported. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had rejected his plea, arguing that PSU employees do not qualify for the same treatment as government employees under Section 10(10AA)(i).
The tribunal disagreed. It cited Notification No. 31/2013, which raised the exemption limit from ₹3 lakh to ₹25 lakh for all employees covered under Section 10(10AA)(ii). The department had continued applying the 2002 cap. The ITAT said the notification applies uniformly to non-government employees, including PSU retirees. Since Venkatachalaperumal's leave encashment fell below the ₹25 lakh ceiling, the entire amount qualified.
The old cap had not been updated since 2002, despite salary inflation and rising leave balances. The 2013 notification was a deliberate shift to narrow the gap between government and non-government employees. The tax department's refusal to apply it rested on a narrow reading of who qualifies as a government employee. The tribunal rejected that reading. It directed the assessing officer to recompute the income using the ₹25 lakh threshold.
The ruling does not create a new law. It enforces an existing notification that the department had been ignoring. For any PSU retiree who filed a return after 2013 and was denied the higher exemption, the decision provides grounds to reopen the assessment.
ONGC is the most visible name, the company's financials do not change. The impact lands on the tax burden of individual retirees. For listed PSUs – Coal India, Indian Oil, NTPC, GAIL – the ruling reduces a point of friction for retiring employees. Leave encashment is a one-time payment, so the effect on tax cash flow is limited to that year.
The broader takeaway for PSU employees who claimed the ₹3 lakh cap and later received a notice: the ITAT's reasoning suggests the ₹25 lakh cap applies to all Section 10(10AA)(ii) employees. The exemption remains capped at the actual amount received, and any sum above ₹25 lakh remains taxable. For retirees who left before 2013, the old limit still applies unless the notification is deemed retrospective – an argument the tribunal did not test.
The order, dated May 4, 2026, stated that the exemption under Section 10(10AA)(ii) is subject to the limit specified by the central government through notification. Since Notification No. 31/2013 set that limit at ₹25 lakh, the assessee was entitled to exemption on the full leave encashment. The tribunal did not accept the argument that the notification applied only to government employees.
The ruling was first reported by The Economic Times.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.