
IAB's new framework codifies definitions and quality metrics for AI-powered search visibility. Only 16% of brands measure it systematically. McKinsey projects $750 billion in AI-influenced consumer spend by 2028.
Only 16% of brands systematically measure how their products appear in AI-powered search results, the Interactive Advertising Bureau said. That gap is about to cost them. McKinsey estimates AI search will influence $750 billion in consumer spending by 2028.
The IAB published a report Wednesday called "Measuring Visibility in the AI Era." It sets definitions and quality standards for generative engine optimization, AI-powered search and other forms of unpaid AI discoverability. Every measurement provider currently uses its own metrics and methods. Comparing vendors has been nearly impossible.
The report is designed to help marketers ask the right questions during the request-for-proposals process, said Caroline Giegerich, IAB's vice president of AI. If two vendors report different visibility scores for the same brand, a marketer can now trace the gap back to differences in query sets, data sources or attribution logic.
Giegerich described what she calls the four P's of AI visibility: presence (whether the brand appears at all), positioning (its rank against competitors), prominence (how much space or emphasis the AI gives it) and perception (the tone or context of the mention).
Marketers should also separate directional measurements from decision-grade ones. Directional data is cheaper and faster, useful for spotting early signals. Decision-grade data requires larger sample sizes, validated methodology and documented inputs. It is suited for allocating real budget. A good vendor should offer both, Giegerich said. Running directional queries more often lets brands refine the more expensive decision-grade tests.
"The better the measurements, the higher the computing costs," she said.
The IAB does not yet have a means to enforce the framework. The group is discussing a certification process as the next step, Giegerich said. In the meantime, she expects voluntary compliance to become a competitive differentiator. A vendor that skips specifying its query sets, prompt types or validation methods in an RFP will look less credible than one that does, she said.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.