
Interval funds give retail investors access to private equity and credit with predictable liquidity. Joe DeGrosa explains the trade-offs and why advisor education is critical.
Private markets have long been closed to most retail investors. That is changing. The vehicle doing most of the work is the interval fund.
Joe DeGrosa, CEO of Axxes Capital and co-author of The Financial Advisor’s Guide to Private Investments, laid out the mechanics on Zephyr’s Adjusted for Risk podcast. The regulatory barrier is straightforward. Non-qualified purchasers were historically locked out of private equity and private credit. Registered vehicles like interval funds fit within existing securities rules while still offering access to illiquid assets.
The demand side is easy to explain. Longevity means portfolios need returns over longer time horizons. Public markets are shrinking as a share of the total investable universe. Investors chasing yield in a low-return world look at private credit and private equity not as exotic bets but as necessary allocations.
DeGrosa argued that interval funds fix three structural drawbacks of traditional drawdown funds. Fee alignment is better. Interval funds typically charge a flat management fee rather than the carried-interest model that can create misaligned incentives. Transparency improves because the vehicle is registered and subject to regular reporting. The liquidity mechanism, while limited, is predictable. Most interval funds offer quarterly redemptions capped at 5% of net asset value.
That last point is where the education gap shows up. Advisors need to match client time horizons to the illiquidity of the underlying assets. An interval fund holding private equity is not a cash substitute. The redemption queue exists precisely because the assets cannot be sold quickly. DeGrosa emphasized that the fund’s ability to plan for redemptions – rather than being forced to sell into a down market – is what makes the structure work.
Manager selection matters more in private markets than in public ones. The dispersion between top-quartile and bottom-quartile returns is wider. The persistence of outperformance is harder to achieve. DeGrosa argued that the interval fund wrapper does not solve for manager quality. It only solves for access. The underlying skill of the general partner still drives results.
The diversification case is structural. As public equity markets concentrate into fewer names, the correlation benefits of adding private assets become more compelling. The trade-off is real. The illiquidity premium only materializes if the investor can hold through the full cycle. An advisor who puts a client into an interval fund without explaining the redemption mechanics is setting up a problem at the first market drawdown.
Zephyr’s platform helps advisors locate interval fund strategies that match their clients’ needs. The key is matching the vehicle to the investor’s liquidity profile, not the other way around.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.