
A New Yorker account reveals deep regrets inside the Biden administration over the Gaza war, as more than 100 House Democrats vote to cut Israel aid.
More than a hundred House Democrats voted last week to cut off military aid to Israel. The vote marked a fracture in the party over support for the Jewish state that would have been almost unimaginable five years ago. It also threatens to split Republicans, according to a New Yorker account of the Biden administration's handling of the war in Gaza.
A stark divide emerged among Biden's closest advisers. A few argued there had been "no shortcut" that might have returned the hostages held by Hamas and ended the war without the devastation of Gaza. Others expressed deep regrets. They said they should have put more pressure on Israel to avoid killing so many civilians. They accepted at face value repeated Israeli assurances that the war was nearly over. They too often held back from squeezing Israel because they feared it might jeopardize a potential ceasefire that always seemed imminent, yet kept slipping away. And they never escaped a "moral hazard" that invited Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to provoke Iran by demonstrating that, after each escalation, the U.S. would shoulder the burden of his country's defense.
Jon Finer, Biden's deputy national security adviser, told the New Yorker that for both Hamas and Israel, "civilian harm was not a side effect but part of the strategy." The U.S., he added, "shouldn't tolerate wars in which civilian harm is a goal, and shouldn't allow our weapons to be used for that purpose."
Secretary of State Antony Blinken acknowledged the toll. "How can you not have regrets given the toll that this took on innocent men, women and children?" he said. He borrowed a motto from President Biden: "Question my judgments. Don't question my motives."
The internal debate highlights a broader shift in American politics. The once-sacrosanct bipartisan support for Israel is eroding, driven by mounting civilian casualties and a war that has dragged on longer than many expected. The moral hazard Finer described – the U.S. repeatedly stepping in to defend Israel after each escalation – has created a dynamic where Netanyahu can act without fearing the full consequences. That pattern, some advisers now concede, may have prolonged the conflict and deepened the devastation in Gaza.
The ceasefire that always seemed close never materialized. Each time the U.S. held back on pressure, the reasoning was the same: a deal was just around the corner. That corner kept receding. The result is a policy that some inside the administration now see as a case study in the limits of leverage and the cost of misplaced trust.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.