
Gujarat High Court upholds Rs 6.52 lakh compensation plus interest and penalty for driver who died after falling from bus roof while sleeping due to lack of rest room.
The Gujarat High Court has upheld a compensation award of Rs 6.52 lakh plus accrued interest and a penalty to the family of a GSRTC driver who died after falling from a bus roof while sleeping. The driver, Maganbhai, had been directed to stay overnight at the Ghodasar bus station before covering the Nadiad route the next morning. No rest room was available, so he slept on the roof. During the night he changed position, fell, and suffered fatal injuries.
His family filed a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The employer argued the death was not work-related because the driver was off-duty. The initial commissioner awarded the Rs 6.52 lakh plus interest and a penalty for delayed payment. The employer appealed. The High Court rejected the appeal and affirmed the award.
The bench ruled that the death arose out of and in the course of employment. The driver was required to stay overnight due to operational needs. The lack of a rest room forced him to use the bus roof. The court held that an employee who remains on-site at the employer’s direction is still acting within the scope of employment, even during rest periods.
Key factors in the ruling:
The court also rejected the employer’s demand to reduce the compensation. It found the penalty for delayed payment justified because the employer failed to pay promptly after the initial order.
This case sets a precedent for transport operators and any employer that requires staff to stay overnight at work locations. The Gujarat High Court made clear that a bus roof does not qualify as a reasonable sleeping arrangement. Employers must provide safe rest facilities when overnight stays are part of the job.
Failure to do so can trigger compensation claims that include not only the principal sum but also interest and penalty costs. The ruling also reinforces that an employee who remains on-site at the employer’s direction is within the scope of employment during rest periods. That principle expands liability beyond active duty hours.
The judgment is final unless challenged in a higher court. For now, the family receives the full Rs 6.52 lakh with accrued interest. Employers in Gujarat, particularly those running bus stations or logistics hubs, should review their accommodation policies. Investing in basic rest rooms is cheaper than facing compensation awards that include interest and penalties. This case may also prompt unions or regulators to push for minimum rest facility standards in state transport undertakings.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.