
Fairshake's 38-2 record includes a $10M loss in Illinois. The crypto lobby's expanding congressional influence continues with over $100M still to deploy.
Pacific Airport Group currently carries an Alpha Score of n/a, giving AlphaScala's model a neutral read on the setup.
Fairshake, the crypto-backed super PAC, dropped over $10 million in March opposing Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton in the Illinois Democratic primary. She won anyway. It was the PAC's largest campaign loss to date.
The defeat is only the second time Fairshake has come up short in the 2026 cycle. Its overall record heading into summer: 38 wins and 2 losses across the first 40 races, a 95% success rate, according to the PAC's own data.
Rep. Barry Moore, a Republican from Alabama, received roughly $12 million in Fairshake backing for his Senate primary and won. Rep. Andy Barr, a Kentucky Republican, got about $7.17 million and won. Christian Menefee, a Democrat from Texas, received about $6.47 million and won.
The bipartisan spread is deliberate. Fairshake is not picking a party. It is picking a policy position and funding the candidate who will carry it, regardless of party label. The same approach proved effective in the 2024 cycle, when Fairshake and its affiliates spent somewhere between $100 million and $200 million to influence congressional races.
Organizations like Stand With Crypto have tracked rising member counts among pro-crypto candidates. Every major crypto initiative – stablecoin frameworks, exchange licensing, DeFi classification – ultimately runs through Congress. The 2024 election spending already contributed to a shift in tone on Capitol Hill. Stablecoin legislation advanced further than many expected. The SEC's approach softened under political pressure.
Fairshake still has over $100 million to deploy. A 95% win rate and a clear strategy for expanding crypto's political footprint suggest the Illinois loss is an outlier, not a trend.
For context on how congressional action shapes crypto policy, see the recent CLARITY Act delay and its implications.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.