
xAI, now owned by SpaceX, files lawsuit against Minnesota AG Keith Ellison, arguing the law banning AI-generated explicit images violates the First Amendment.
Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company, now operating under the name SpaceXAI, has sued Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison over a new state law that targets non-consensual sexually explicit AI-generated images. The complaint, filed in federal court, argues the law violates the First Amendment by imposing a broad ban on the tools of visual expression, CNBC reported.
The legislation, set to take effect Saturday, applies to websites and apps that let users create deepfake explicit images. It sets a fine of $500,000 for every image generated through such a platform. The Minnesota state Senate passed the bill in April after Senator Erin Maye Quade learned that a man had used social media photos of more than 80 women he knew to create sexualized content without their permission.
xAI's attorneys wrote that the statute “imposes an overbroad, content-based ban on free speech and the tools of visual expression in a clumsy attempt to prohibit ‘nudification.’” The company warned that if users generated 100,000 prohibited images, a platform could face fines totaling $50 billion. The complaint calls the penalties “eye-popping” and says the law punishes speech before it happens.
Maye Quade told CNBC the law is comparable to statutes banning voyeuristic acts like secretly taking explicit photographs through windows. She argued the legislation addresses a modern technological equivalent of an old problem.
This is not xAI's first legal fight over AI-generated content. In a separate case, the company challenged a California law aimed at curbing deepfakes in election campaigns. A federal judge partially sided with xAI, striking down provisions that restricted the use of AI-generated deepfakes during elections.
xAI also faces a proposed class-action lawsuit in California. The suit alleges that its Grok chatbot and image-generation tools were used to create and distribute child sexual abuse material (CSAM) by manipulating real photos and videos of the plaintiffs. The lawsuit claims the company failed to provide authorities with information about individuals who allegedly used Grok to “nudify” victims' images.
In response, Musk's company said it strictly prohibits the creation of nude or sexualized images of individuals without consent. It added in the Minnesota complaint that it has taken legal action against users who bypass its safeguards to generate such content.
A British lawmaker, Jess Asato, is also suing xAI in London's High Court. Asato, a member of the UK's governing Labour Party, said users produced fabricated images of her after she publicly criticized Musk and Grok. Among the AI-generated content was a video that allegedly depicted her “being chloroformed and prepared for a sexual assault.”
Asato is asking the court to direct xAI to implement “effective and permanent technical measures” to prevent Grok from generating manipulated images of her in the future. Her legal team said the case could have far-reaching implications for the AI industry, arguing that no previous lawsuit has applied UK privacy and data protection laws in this manner against an AI developer.
The Minnesota case is set to move forward as the law takes effect. Musk's company, which now operates as SpaceXAI, is also facing a separate lawsuit in California over the same issues. The judge in the California case partially blocked the state's deepfake election law, a ruling that could influence arguments in the Minnesota challenge.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.