
Dunamu will store seized digital assets for South Korea's National Police Agency under a one-year contract, following a tender process and past missing crypto incidents.
Dunamu, the operator of South Korea's largest crypto exchange Upbit, won a one-year contract to store and manage digital assets seized by the National Police Agency.
The company said on Aug. 7 it was named the final winner of the police agency's public tender process after technical negotiations concluded the procurement. Dunamu had been designated the preferred bidder on July 8.
Procurement documents show the contract was awarded through an open competitive tender run by South Korea's Public Procurement Service. Dunamu received the highest technical evaluation score of 94.14 before being selected. The contract is valued at 267 million won, roughly $195,000, for one year of custody and management services covering cryptocurrencies confiscated during criminal investigations.
Korea Digital Asset Custody (K-DAC) finished second with 91.29 points. Hecto Wallet One placed third with 87.27 points.
Seized cryptocurrencies will be held through Upbit Custody, Dunamu's digital asset custody service. The company said the platform operates with 24-hour monitoring every day of the year, including nights, weekends and public holidays. The custody environment uses 100% offline cold wallets isolated from the public internet. Dunamu said its infrastructure incorporates Multi-Party Computation, multi-signature technology and wallet segregation, which allows assets to be separated by type and intended use.
A Dunamu representative said the company would apply its security technology and operational controls to support public safety and digital policing infrastructure.
Industry officials questioned whether the tender requirements favored larger market operators. According to local media reports, bidders had to accept immediate custody of seized cryptocurrencies, maintain a round-the-clock response system and guarantee full compensation if assets were lost through hacking. Several custody industry officials told local media those conditions were easier for a large exchange operator with established infrastructure to meet than for standalone custody providers. One official described competing under those conditions as difficult from the outset.
The National Police Agency rejected suggestions that the outcome had been predetermined. The agency told local media the contractor was selected through a fair competitive process.
The police custody project follows multiple incidents of missing cryptocurrencies held by South Korean authorities. In February, Seoul's Gangnam Police Station confirmed that 22 Bitcoin worth about 2.1 billion won, or roughly $1.6 million, had disappeared from police custody. The coins had been surrendered during a 2021 investigation. Investigators discovered during a nationwide review that they had been transferred from the storage wallet without authorization. Police said the physical cold wallet remained in their possession, suggesting the private keys had been accessed even though the storage device had not been removed. The Gyeonggi Northern Provincial Police Agency opened an internal investigation examining access logs, key management procedures and blockchain transaction records.
Attention had already turned to law enforcement's handling of digital assets after an earlier case involving the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office, where local reports said 320 Bitcoin seized in a criminal investigation was lost. Local media also reported another incident in 2022 in which police confirmed that seized Bitcoin had gone missing.
Following those incidents, South Korean authorities moved to place custody responsibilities with an external institution capable of maintaining dedicated security controls for seized digital assets. The finalized agreement now places those assets under Upbit Custody for the next year while the National Police Agency oversees the arrangement under the terms of the awarded contract.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.