
The DGCA is set to tighten drug-testing rules for aviation personnel after a pilot's preliminary positive test. The proposed changes could increase operational costs and crew scheduling pressure.
India's civil aviation regulator is considering a tougher testing regime for psychoactive substances among pilots and other aviation personnel, following a preliminary positive screening result on an Air India flight, according to people familiar with the matter.
A meeting scheduled for Wednesday is expected to decide on the new provisions, the people said. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is drafting a revised Civil Aviation Requirement (CAR) that would replace the existing framework. The current rules cover scheduled commercial operators, maintenance organisations, flying training schools, and air navigation service providers. They require at least 10% of covered employees to be tested each year. Tests screen for amphetamine, opiates, cannabis, cocaine, barbiturates, and benzodiazepines. Employees who return a non-negative result are immediately removed from safety-sensitive duties until a confirmatory report arrives.
The August 4 incident involved the pilot of an Air India Phuket-Delhi flight operated on an Airbus A320neo. The secondary test result has not yet been officially confirmed. The DGCA has not publicly commented on the case.
The proposed changes would alter the testing process, including sample size and testing requirements, the people said. More frequent testing could raise operational costs for airlines and other operators covered under the CAR. It would also increase the risk of pilots being temporarily grounded while awaiting secondary results, which could strain crew scheduling at a time when Indian aviation is already facing pilot shortages.
The people said the proposal would be placed for stakeholder consultation after the DGCA's internal decision. The timeline for finalising the new CAR remains unclear. Wednesday's meeting is expected to set the modalities.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.