
A Delhi HC ruling on a father withdrawing ₹8.6 lakh from his daughter's PPF account clarifies parental limits on minor PPF accounts and contribution caps.
A Delhi High Court ruling on a father who withdrew ₹8.6 lakh from his daughter's Public Provident Fund account has drawn a firm line around what parents can and cannot do with a minor's PPF savings. The court ordered the father to return the full amount with 8% annual interest, rejecting his argument that the withdrawal should count against his maintenance obligations.
The daughter sued her father after he closed her PPF account in 2016, claiming the funds were needed for her education and upkeep. She later testified the money never reached her, and that after her parents separated she struggled to pay for college. The father countered that the amount should be set off against the maintenance he had paid to his ex-wife and daughter. The court disagreed, ruling that a parent holds a child's PPF account in a fiduciary capacity and cannot divert those savings to meet a parental duty.
Aditya Chopra, Managing Partner at The Victoriam Legalis, said a parent or guardian can withdraw money from a child's PPF account but only for the child's education, medical treatment, or other legitimate needs. He stressed that the funds cannot be used for the parent's personal expenses or to discharge the parent's independent legal obligation to maintain the child.
Apoorva Pandey, an advocate at Delhi High Court, added that even as guardian, a parent holds the child's savings in trust. “Where funds are invested in the child’s name for the child’s benefit, the parent, even as guardian, holds such funds in a fiduciary capacity and cannot utilise them to offset maintenance obligations,” she said.
The ruling does not mean a parent cannot close a minor's PPF account on maturity or withdraw funds for genuine child-related expenses. What it prohibits is using the child's savings as a substitute for parental support. Once the child turns 18, the guardian's role ends, and the parent must hand over the full account balance.
Separately, the court's decision underscores a contribution rule that often trips up families. A parent cannot contribute more than ₹1.5 lakh in a single financial year across both their own PPF account and the child's account. If both parents deposit into the same minor's account, the total still cannot exceed ₹1.5 lakh a year. Any excess above that limit forfeits tax benefits and may not earn interest under PPF rules.
The case is a reminder that a minor's PPF account is the child's asset from the start. The parent is a manager, not an owner.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.