The DeFi Education Fund flagged 16 'anti-DeFi' amendments on Wednesday, warning they could strip safeguards for developers and users ahead of Thursday's markup.
The DeFi Education Fund (DEF) released a list of 16 proposed amendments to the CLARITY Act on Wednesday, labeling them "anti-DeFi" and warning they would remove crucial safeguards for developers and users. The public alert lands one day before the Senate Banking Committee convenes to mark up the long-awaited crypto market structure bill.
The DEF did not publish the full text of each amendment. The group's warning makes clear, however, that the proposed changes would treat DeFi protocol developers as financial intermediaries. That reclassification would create a compliance burden that many decentralized projects cannot meet.
The practical consequence: protocols might be forced to block US users or cease operating entirely. The liability shift would contradict the original intent of the CLARITY Act, which sought to provide a clear framework for digital assets while allowing permissionless innovation to continue.
The naive view: any crypto legislation moving forward is good for token prices because it ends regulatory ambiguity. That read ignores the mechanism of the amendments. A bill that passes with anti-DeFi provisions would directly attack the permissionless architecture that gives DeFi tokens their economic value. Governance tokens tied to US-facing protocols would likely reprice lower if the markup signals that developers can be held liable for the actions of anonymous users.
The better read focuses on execution risk. The committee's markup is the first legislative filter. If the 16 amendments are adopted, the bill's path through the full Senate becomes harder. Opposition from the DeFi industry would intensify, and the final law could emerge either with the damaging language intact or in a stalled state that prolongs uncertainty for months. A clean bill, without the anti-DeFi provisions, would remove a major regulatory overhang for DeFi tokens.
The markup session will reveal whether committee members are receptive to redefining how decentralized protocols are treated under securities law. The DEF's early warning is designed to mobilize developers and users ahead of the vote. The group's framing of the amendments as a direct threat to the sector's ability to operate in the US raises the stakes for the committee's decisions.
Language that assigns liability to protocol developers would force projects to restructure or relocate. Liquidity on decentralized exchanges could thin if US market participants are walled off. Centralized entities would face less competitive pressure, shifting the market structure away from the open systems that DeFi has built over the past five years.
The markup outcome will set the bill's direction for the rest of this legislative session. Traders watching DeFi assets should monitor the final committee print for any wording that imposes obligations on developers or restricts non-custodial wallets. If the anti-DeFi amendments survive, the bill will face a tougher fight on the Senate floor, extending the period of regulatory risk. The DEF's alert signals that the industry will treat any such language as a line-in-the-sand issue.
The broader legislative push for the CLARITY Act is covered in CLARITY Act Markup Thursday: Armstrong Says Bill 'Closer Than Ever'. For ongoing coverage of how regulatory decisions affect crypto markets, see crypto market analysis.
Drafted by the AlphaScala research model and grounded in primary market data – live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.