
Cursor's talent chief says work trials fail when companies extract without giving back. The fix: make the on-site a two-way exchange.
Work trials can help a candidate and a company decide whether a job is a real fit. Cursor's head of talent says many employers run them the wrong way.
The biggest mistake is treating the trial as a one-way extraction, Adam Ward, Cursor's head of talent, said on an episode of "Lenny's Podcast" released Sunday.
"This is where most companies get it wrong on the on-site," Ward said. "They're almost always buying. This is like 'we are assessing. We're extracting information. We're not giving much back to the candidate.'"
Instead, Ward said a good on-site, where candidates work with employees on a project, should "feel more two-way." That means "handpicking" who the candidate interacts with, from the first greeting to who they sit next to at lunch. He said this ensures the candidate has the information they need to make their decision and lets staff give feedback on the candidate.
Ward said Cursor, which SpaceX acquired for $60 billion earlier this year, is committed to on-sites even though they are "quite expensive" and a "big ask of candidates." They give a fuller picture of a potential hire than a conventional interview and send a strong hiring signal to both sides, Ward said.
"For a lot of companies, it's hard to think of a better way than doing side-by-side real work to get those signals," Ward said.
The AI coding company's work trials come as competition for top AI talent has raised the stakes in hiring. Ward said Cursor sees recruiting as a companywide effort, built around identifying a small group of standout candidates and cultivating them over time, rather than filtering a large volume of applicants through a standard interview funnel.
Cursor's CEO, Michael Truell, has described a similarly intensive approach. He said the startup flew across the world to persuade some engineers who had initially turned it down and even invented dinners with researchers to revive conversations, Business Insider previously reported.
Cursor has also used a two-day on-site work trial for engineering and design candidates, during which applicants work from a frozen version of its codebase and spend time with the team. Truell said the process helps the company assess both technical skill and whether the candidate and company want to work together.
Echoing Truell's point, Ward said the payoff extends beyond testing technical competence. "Imagine the amount of core values and collaboration and other things you could get over a stretch of time," he said, "that could be arguably more important than the specific technical skill."
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.