
Cuban warned the one-time wealth tax on billionaires could push startup founders out of California and said he would make not being in the state a condition for investments.
Mark Cuban told Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) that he "doesn't understand business" during a social media exchange over California's proposed 5% wealth tax on billionaires, warning the measure could push startup founders and investors out of the state.
The argument centered on Proposition 40, a ballot measure that would impose a one-time 5% wealth tax on state residents with more than $1 billion in assets. The California Democratic Party has endorsed it. Gov. Gavin Newsom has opposed it.
In a video posted to X on Saturday, Khanna defended the tax as a way to preserve health care for working-class Californians. He said the "Sacramento establishment" and lobbyists fighting the measure were "blatantly out of touch."
Cuban pushed back with a practical objection. Founders of fast-growing startups can become billionaires on paper without holding hundreds of millions in liquid assets, he said. They are "cash poor, stock rich," Cuban wrote.
"If this passes, only idiot startup founders stay in Cali," he wrote.
Cuban went further, saying the measure would affect his own investment decisions.
"I will make NOT being in California a pre requisite for an investment," he wrote. "Ideology is not a strategy Ro."
Khanna proposed a workaround. Founders whose wealth is tied up in private-company stock could pledge those shares as collateral for a non-recourse government loan to pay the tax, he wrote. The loan would run roughly 10 years. If the founder could not repay, the state would take the shares. The founder would not be personally liable if the company failed.
Cuban rejected the idea. California would effectively lend founders money that immediately returned to the state as tax revenue, producing no net cash gain from those taxpayers. And if founders could not repay, the state would end up owning stakes in private companies.
"Cali, You make it. We take it!" Cuban wrote.
Khanna said the loan mechanism was aimed at a narrow group. He claimed 72% of billionaire wealth is held in public stock and said the state would collect from the vast majority of billionaires with liquid assets. The financing proposal was for true "paper billionaires" whose fortunes are tied to illiquid holdings, he wrote.
"Mark, come on a road trip with me around California, Pennsylvania and the country and ask ordinary Americans how they feel about a billionaire tax," Khanna wrote. "Most say, I promise you, why only 5 percent?"
Cuban shot back: "You don't understand business Ro."
A successful founder could spend 10 years growing a company, create thousands of jobs and pay hundreds of millions in federal and state taxes without ever having $250 million in liquid assets to repay the proposed state loan, Cuban argued.
"Is that what you want your state to be?" he wrote.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.