The CLARITY Act stalls in the Senate as seven Democrats block it over ethics and stablecoin rules. Industry giants BlackRock, Goldman, Fidelity urge passage. Vote may slip to 2026.
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act will not reach a Senate floor vote before the August recess. The bill is delayed until September 2026, crowded out by spending debates and midterm maneuvering, according to legislative aides familiar with the schedule. The delay leaves the crypto industry without a federal framework for at least another year.
Senate Republicans released a 616-page updated text merging earlier versions from the Banking and Agriculture committees. The bill assigns spot market oversight of "digital commodities" to the CFTC and investment contract assets to the SEC. It protects software developers and decentralized networks that do not hold customer assets from liability for illicit activity conducted by others on their platforms. A White House-backed ethics title bars covered federal officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring digital assets during public service, with enforcement powers restricted to the Attorney General. State attorneys general and private parties cannot bring actions under that title. Fines for violators reach $250,000 per day.
The compromise language did not win over seven Senate Democrats. They said the ethics safeguards and stablecoin rules remain insufficient. Their opposition blocks the 60-vote threshold needed to clear the floor. A vote could now slip to 2026, though the bill's final passage is uncertain given the November midterms and a packed calendar.
Major banking groups, including BlackRock, Fidelity, Franklin Templeton, Goldman Sachs, and SoFi, publicly urged passage. The Fraternal Order of Police reversed its April opposition and wrote a letter of support on July 24, after the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act provisions were clarified.
Disagreements over anti-money laundering scope for decentralized finance and enforcement authority over federal officials keep the bill stuck. Federal powers over privacy tools are also contested. Critics argue the CLARITY Act leaves gaps. Transaction mixers are not directly targeted. Many unhosted wallets and DeFi networks fall outside Bank Secrecy Act rules. Federal agencies lack explicit statutory authority to restrict or track mixers under the current text, leaving what some analysts call a loophole for illicit finance. Banks warn this threatens traditional financial safeguards.
William Quigley, co-founder of WAX and Tether, said three provisions will dominate once the bill moves to rulemaking. Section 404 (stablecoin activity-based rewards) and Section 304 (temporarily freezing accounts and indemnification) are "mostly resolved at the legislative level," he said. The drama will shift to the rulemaking process. The Treasury and the SEC will lead the definition work, with the CFTC contributing on digital commodity spot markets. "The banking and crypto industry will be deeply involved in helping shape the definitions in their favor," Quigley said. He warned investors to distinguish between activity-based rewards and passive yield. "Activity based rewards are not in any way the same as the passive yield a customer earns in a savings account."
SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce views payment stablecoins as essential for blockchain transactions. She supported SEC staff guidance allowing a 2% net capital haircut for broker-dealers holding stablecoins, aligning them with money market funds instead of punitive 100% requirements. She warned that moving lending or yield vaults onto blockchain rails does not exempt them from federal securities laws.
China's People's Bank made its digital yuan interest-bearing on Jan. 1, 2026, while banning private yuan stablecoins. Yifan He, CEO of Red Date Technology, called stablecoins practical payment tools when managed inside compliant frameworks. He said mainstream blockchain evolution relies on regulated institutional implementation, not decentralized retail yield-chasing.
Goldman Sachs, a prominent backer of the CLARITY Act, carries an AlphaScala Alpha Score of 59 out of 100, labeled Moderate within the Financials sector. The score reflects the firm's balanced exposure to regulatory risk and its diversified revenue streams. A delay in the bill does not directly hit Goldman's earnings. It keeps a lid on the pace of its digital asset custody and tokenization expansion.
The next concrete marker is September 2026, when the Senate returns and must decide whether to slot the CLARITY Act before the midterm recess. If it fails again, the bill's best path is a post-election lame-duck session, where the calculus could shift, according to legislative aides. Until then, the industry operates under the same patchwork of state rules and SEC enforcement actions it has for years.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.