
The GSR legal chief's assessment signals that unresolved debates over stablecoin interest payments and ethical questions could stall crypto legislation, leaving issuers in limbo.
Joshua Riezman, legal chief at crypto market maker GSR, now sees less than a 50% chance that the Clarity Act will pass the current Senate session. The assessment, delivered in a recent market update, marks a sharp downgrade from earlier expectations and puts a concrete number on the legislative risk facing stablecoin issuers and digital asset platforms.
The Clarity Act is a proposed framework that would define how digital assets, including stablecoins, are regulated in the United States. Its passage would create a federal licensing regime for stablecoin issuers, establish reserve and redemption requirements, and clarify the jurisdictional lines between the SEC and CFTC. Without it, the industry continues to operate under a patchwork of state money transmitter licenses and enforcement-driven guidance.
Riezman attributed the dimming odds to two specific, unresolved debates: stablecoin yield and ethics concerns. Each issue has the potential to fracture the bipartisan coalition needed to move the bill through a closely divided Senate.
The yield question turns on whether stablecoin issuers should be permitted to pay interest to holders. Allowing yield could reclassify stablecoins as securities, triggering registration, disclosure, and custody requirements that most issuers are not equipped to handle. The industry has largely avoided yield-bearing stablecoins to stay clear of securities laws. Some lawmakers, however, view yield as a consumer benefit that should be permitted, creating a direct conflict with the securities-law framework. That tension has not been resolved in the current draft, and Riezman indicated it remains a major obstacle.
Ethics concerns center on the concentration of power within a few private stablecoin issuers and the potential for conflicts of interest when the same entities control both issuance and the platforms where stablecoins trade. Consumer advocates and several legislators have raised questions about self-dealing, market manipulation, and the systemic risk of a single issuer dominating dollar-pegged liquidity. These issues have complicated the bill's path through committee, where amendments addressing governance and transparency have yet to secure enough support.
A failed or delayed Clarity Act would leave Circle (issuer of USDC) and Tether (issuer of USDT) without a clear federal framework. Both firms currently rely on state-level licenses and attestations, not federal bank-like supervision. Institutional adoption of stablecoins for payments and settlement has been held back partly by this regulatory gap. A legislative stall extends that uncertainty, potentially pushing large banks and asset managers to wait for a more definitive rule set.
The contrast with other jurisdictions is becoming starker. The Bank of England recently softened its proposed £20,000 stablecoin holding cap, signaling a more accommodating approach to keep issuers onshore. That move, covered in our BoE Softens Stablecoin Cap Plans to Keep Issuers Onshore analysis, highlights how regulatory competition is accelerating. If the U.S. fails to pass a framework this session, stablecoin activity could continue migrating to jurisdictions with clearer rules, a dynamic that may eventually pressure lawmakers to act.
The current Senate session has a limited legislative window before the November elections. The next concrete marker is whether the Senate Banking Committee schedules a markup of the Clarity Act before the August recess. If no markup is announced by mid-July, the below-50% odds will likely harden into a near-certain delay. Stablecoin issuers and crypto platforms would then have to navigate at least another year of enforcement-driven regulation, with the SEC and state regulators filling the void. For traders and investors, that means continued volatility around regulatory headlines and a higher premium on compliance-ready stablecoin projects, such as those pursuing dual-compliant models outlined in our Alchemy Chain Roadmap Targets Dual-Compliant Stablecoin Payments coverage.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.