
AEHT warns Section 604 of the CLARITY Act could weaken anti-money laundering safeguards. Senate has no floor vote date yet. Polymarket sees 42% chance of passage by 2026.
The CLARITY Act has drawn fresh opposition from a trafficking prevention group as Senate lawmakers weigh the crypto market structure bill ahead of a narrowing legislative window this year.
According to a letter obtained by Punchbowl, the Alliance to End Human Trafficking (AEHT) urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to revisit a decentralized finance provision in the bill. The group argued the language could weaken safeguards against illicit finance.
The concern centers on Section 604, which would codify the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA). Under that provision, software developers who build decentralized blockchain applications would not be held responsible for crimes committed by users of those platforms. They would also not be treated as money transmitters.
In its letter, the Catholic-backed anti-trafficking organization warned the language could introduce regulatory gaps that make it harder for authorities to detect and track financial activity linked to crimes such as human trafficking.
AEHT argued Congress should carefully assess whether the provision contains sufficient anti-money laundering protections and accountability measures before advancing the legislation.
“At a moment when Congress continues bipartisan efforts to strengthen anti-trafficking protections – including through legislation such as the Frederick Douglass Trafficking Victims Prevention and Protection Reauthorization Act – policymakers should avoid creating unintended loopholes that could undermine those efforts,” the group wrote.
Pressure on lawmakers has increased as competing interest groups continue lobbying around key sections of the crypto legislation.
Earlier this month, gaming organizations pushed senators to include language preventing prediction market platforms from offering sports betting products. The latest intervention from AEHT adds another layer of scrutiny to a bill already facing debate over ethics provisions and the treatment of decentralized finance participants.
Those discussions come as the Senate works within a limited timeframe before its August recess. The U.S. House has scheduled a hearing on the CLARITY Act for July 17. The Senate has yet to set a date for a floor vote.
Recent comments from Senator Cynthia Lummis suggested lawmakers have made significant progress on negotiations. Previous estimates indicated roughly 80% to 85% of the legislation had been finalized. Unresolved issues tied to ethics rules and the BRCA provision continue to complicate the path forward.
As opposition groups raise concerns, crypto industry organizations are stepping up efforts to secure support for the legislation.
In a June 23 X post, the Digital Chamber said it recently met with lawmakers to discuss the CLARITY Act and advocate for what it described as a clearer framework for digital asset markets. The organization confirmed its outreach included discussions with Senator Lummis, one of the leading congressional supporters of crypto legislation.
Market participants appear increasingly uncertain about the bill’s chances of becoming law this year. Data from Polymarket assigns a 42% probability that President Donald Trump will sign the CLARITY Act before the end of 2026.
With both supporters and critics intensifying their campaigns, Senate lawmakers now face mounting pressure to resolve outstanding disputes before deciding whether the crypto market structure bill can advance to a final vote.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.