
National average: 52% of income. In San Jose, families spend 83%. Redfin and Winnie break down where housing and childcare cost the most — and least.
Families across the U.S. spend 52% of their annual income on housing and childcare combined, according to a new analysis from Redfin and the childcare platform Winnie. The study covered the 100 most populous metropolitan areas and found that the share varies wildly – from below 40% in some cities to above 95% in others.
In San Jose, California, the median household income was $176,401 in 2024, more than double the national median of $83,730. Yet that city's combined housing and childcare burden hit 83.1%. High pay does not shield families from high costs. A similar pattern plays out in other expensive coastal metros.
"A high-paying job in San Francisco or Los Angeles can get wiped out fast once you factor for rent and day care, while a lower-paying job in a smaller metro might actually leave your family with more disposable income," Redfin's chief economist Daryl Fairweather told Business Insider. "Like anything else, it's ultimately a tradeoff and the decision should depend on your personal circumstances."
The reverse also holds. Some cities with relatively cheap housing still demand a large share of income for childcare, leaving families with less breathing room than the home price alone suggests. "A cheap house doesn't always translate to a cheap life," Fairweather said. "We're seeing metros where housing is a steal, but childcare is eating up a big portion of the family budget, and vice versa in places like San Francisco. Families need to look at the whole picture before they decide where to plant roots."
The data underscore a challenge for parents and prospective parents weighing relocation. Housing gets most of the attention when families compare cities. But childcare can run upward of $45,000 a year, and the local price of that care shifts the calculus significantly.
Among the metros with the lowest combined burden – where families spent roughly 40% of income – the common thread was moderate home prices and relatively low childcare costs. At the other extreme, families in some cities were devoting more than nine out of every ten dollars of income to housing and daycare.
Fairweather's point is direct: the headline housing number is not enough. A family earning $120,000 in a low-cost city may end up with more take-home cash than a family earning $200,000 in a high-cost one, once childcare is factored in.
The analysis covered both renters and owners, using Census Bureau income data and Winnie's child-care cost benchmarks. The national median income of $83,730 serves as a baseline. Any metro where the combined share tops 80% forces serious tradeoffs.
For families making decisions about where to live, the data suggest that looking beyond the mortgage or rent payment – and weighting local childcare costs explicitly – can change which city comes out ahead.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.